HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

hun3

no profile record

投稿

What does it mean to be a programming language, anyhow? (2021) [pdf]

dl.acm.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 hun3·6 か月前·0 コメント

Every board game rulebook is awful [pdf] (2024)

boardgametextbook.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 hun3·6 か月前·1 コメント

Is the nervous system a democracy? (2016)

scientificamerican.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 hun3·6 か月前·0 コメント

Profiling with Ctrl-C (2024)

yosefk.com
92 ポイント·投稿者 hun3·6 か月前·13 コメント

コメント

hun3
·19 日前·議論
> The OS is a thin layer providing an abstract and consistent interface regardless of the hardware configuration.

This is called a hardware abstraction layer, not OS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_abstraction
hun3
·19 日前·議論
System WebView but Electron is now the system
hun3
·19 日前·議論
The operating system has historically trusted the applications not to do dumb things too much.

Only now we're witnessing the consequences much more frequently thanks to accelerated slop.
hun3
·21 日前·議論
(zenzi)³

I mean zenzi-cubic
hun3
·先月·議論
China has proxies that sell cheaper access to frontier models in exchange for permission to train on your data.
hun3
·先月·議論
Right.

As an example: Oracle and PostgreSQL don't have dirty reads: READ UNCOMMITTED does nothing. MySQL's concurrency model depends on the engine.
hun3
·先月·議論
What keeps users themselves from vibe-coding their own software?

If you don't own quality, why should I pay? You're just a middleman at that point.
hun3
·先月·議論
If you squint hard enough, you'll notice your bank account serves as an IPC semaphore replenishing API credit balances.

Your wallet is now a real-time communication channel.
hun3
·先月·議論
_RealShipOpts has a constructor.
hun3
·2 か月前·議論
With consent, yes.
hun3
·2 か月前·議論
No, "virtual machine" alone doesn't make things safer.

Shrink your attack surface.

Use a completely locked down seccomp. Use nsjail or gVisor for containers. Use microvm or libkrun for full OS.

Lesser attack surface is what matters. Virtualization is only half of the story.
hun3
·2 か月前·議論
Avoiding problems outside your business problem domain, and can therefore guide the AI more effectively towards building the right thing.
hun3
·2 か月前·議論
(Note that this still assumes that each biased-coin toss is i.i.d.)
hun3
·2 か月前·議論
They are orthogonal.

Suppose you have 100ms audio latency and no wait time. Then, natural pause will trigger response immediately but you won't notice it has started until after ~200ms (round-trip time). Twice as annoying.
hun3
·3 か月前·議論
But it's still a bit more difficult to sue them for leaking your company's data.

At least for now.
hun3
·3 か月前·議論
You can write unambiguous (UB-free) code and the compiler's output will be deterministic. There will even be a spec that explains how your source maps to your program's behavior. LLM has neither.

Also, if you need to control performance, you still need to know how CPU cache and branch prediction works, both of which exists at the abstraction level of assembly.
hun3
·3 か月前·議論
How can you read a language you didn't learn?
hun3
·3 か月前·議論
PatchGuard would like to have a word with you.
hun3
·3 か月前·議論
Ironic, since Unix is itself an embodiment of "worse is better."
hun3
·3 か月前·議論
I used floating timestamps as some kind of an identity. If there is ever a conflict, I just increase it by 1 ulp until it doesn't collide with anything. Sorry.