HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ibrahima

no profile record

投稿

Teaching coding agents to debug Rails memory issues with derailed_benchmarks

superconductor.com
6 ポイント·投稿者 ibrahima·2 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

ibrahima
·2 か月前·議論
Isn't their compute provider Microsoft (their owner)?
ibrahima
·5 か月前·議論
> I understand that the 'updating the part of the page that's changed' functionality is now dramatically slower, more unresponsive, and less reliable than the 'reload the entire thing' approach was, and it feels like browsing the site via Citrix over dial-up half the time, but look, sacrifices have to be made in the name of making things better even if the sacrifice is that things get worse instead.

I don't think they were being serious.
ibrahima
·5 か月前·議論
FWIW, I find the new React-based diff viewer worse than the old server-rendered page. I disabled the preview for this reason. It does have some nice features but overall it feels more finicky. I would think that in theory this should be better at handling large diffs but I'm not sure that that's the case, and at least the UX feels more choppy.
ibrahima
·5 か月前·議論
I guess this is why Sam Altman wants to scan everyone's eyeballs.
ibrahima
·7 か月前·議論
Iirc the complaint was that machine generated captions were not good enough :(. Yeah it's pretty sad.
ibrahima
·7 か月前·議論
Yeah... I bought the regular version a few months before the bigger one was announced. Now I kinda want it but can't really justify it at this point. It's a cool product though and a lot of the code is open source or has open source alternatives (e.g. the official backend is not but they have sponsored the development of open source alternatives so that if they go out of business or something you can host your own backend).
ibrahima
·7 か月前·議論
Funnily you're describing https://usetrmnl.com/ which also happens to be pretty hacker friendly.
ibrahima
·8 か月前·議論
That's basically MOOCs, but those kinda fizzled out. It's tough to actually stay focused for a full-length university-level course outside of a university environment IMO, especially if you're working and have a family, etc.

(I mean, I have no idea how Coursera/edX/etc are doing behind the scenes, but it doesn't seem like people talk about them the way they used to ~10 years ago.)
ibrahima
·昨年·議論
So does that mean that if you "opt out", Google _won't_ use your code for training, even on a personal/free plan?

### 1. Is my code, including prompts and answers, used to train Google's models?

This depends entirely on the type of auth method you use.

- *Auth method 1:* Yes. When you use your personal Google account, the Gemini Code Assist Privacy Notice for Individuals applies. Under this notice, your *prompts, answers, and related code are collected* and may be used to improve Google's products, which includes model training.

### 2. What are "Usage Statistics" and what does the opt-out control?

The "Usage Statistics" setting is the single control for all optional data collection in the Gemini CLI. The data it collects depends on your account type:

- *Auth method 1:* When enabled, this setting allows Google to collect both anonymous telemetry (like commands run and performance metrics) and *your prompts and answers* for model improvement.

Does this mean that for a personal account, your data is always "collected", but the opt out may prevent your data from being used for training? Also, the question was about "code", but this addresses only addresses "prompts and answers". Is code covered under prompts? The first FAQ lists "*prompts, answers, and related code are collected*" as separate items so it's still not clear what happens to code and if there's a way to opt out from your code being used for model training IMO.