HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ikeashark

no profile record

投稿

FFmpeg: Revoke Social Media Delegation

lists.ffmpeg.org
6 ポイント·投稿者 ikeashark·9 か月前·0 コメント

Why the numbers 6-7 are driving math teachers up the wall

npr.org
14 ポイント·投稿者 ikeashark·9 か月前·23 コメント

What's in a humanoid hand? – Boston Dynamics [video]

youtube.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 ikeashark·9 か月前·0 コメント

Tsujigiri

en.wikipedia.org
4 ポイント·投稿者 ikeashark·9 か月前·0 コメント

How does EUV Photolithography work? – Branch Education [video]

youtube.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 ikeashark·10 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

ikeashark
·3 か月前·議論
Consider the elephant when?
ikeashark
·5 か月前·議論
I'm baffled the author doesn't even have a surface level understanding of how a computer works.

He instead seems to make up a mental image of how a neural network might work on a computer and uses that representation instead.
ikeashark
·5 か月前·議論
What are you trying to say? That any and all invasion of privacy is okay as long as it is in the name journalism?
ikeashark
·5 か月前·議論
Would you then be okay with journalists publishing CSAM images & videos from the Epstein case?
ikeashark
·5 か月前·議論
1. You don't need to be famous, how do you think blackmail works on non-famous women?

2. freaky
ikeashark
·5 か月前·議論
Seriously? Would you be okay with a "journalist" showing the whole world your sextape?
ikeashark
·5 か月前·議論
I'm not both siding this, I heavily dislike DOGE and consequently the 45-47 presidency.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43624536#43625085

It calls DOGE workers "wreckers" and it lists all the staffers related with the DOGE project with a detailed description of how they're related and what they've done recently. They even have a page just for revealing anonymous staffers in court documents: https://dogetrack.info/people/aliases/

I agree DOGE is destructive but is it productive to reveal all the names and history of every staffer, contractor, lawyer, etc... related to the DOGE project?

The above is why I see it as "biased and emotionally charged".

This website very well could've gone without the extensive list of people related. Which is why I see this as more of a harassment list.
ikeashark
·5 か月前·議論
Peter Thiel is gay??
ikeashark
·5 か月前·議論
This websites seems incredibly biased and uses quite emotional language.
ikeashark
·7 か月前·議論
The US Government, Saudis, consumer/private investors apparently or at least the one that can build the most economically useful AI. I myself believe Google is most likely.
ikeashark
·7 か月前·議論
But OpenAI legitimately needs HBM. Amazon in this instance doesn't need food and is doing purely to create artificial scarcity. If OpenAI were to actually not use the HBM then it could mean something.
ikeashark
·7 か月前·議論
I doubt this is to create artificial scarcity. Especially when OpenAI is the biggest player thought to be able to build AGI first and that it is now backed by the US & the Saudis.
ikeashark
·8 か月前·議論
I'm not sure what platform of Google Photos you were trying, but on the web and mobile app, you can drag to select sequential photos (i.e multi-select).
ikeashark
·9 か月前·議論
As of right now there is 6 points and 7 comments. Take that as you will.
ikeashark
·9 か月前·議論
>AI hallucinates

>Look inside

>GPT-4o-mini
ikeashark
·9 か月前·議論
I assume that with whatever onboard audio model they use, it can only handle conversational type audio.
ikeashark
·9 か月前·議論
I find it funny that they deliberately avoid having the figure robot actually touch water when "washing the dishes". I have to wonder why it doesn't use a rubber wrapping around the hands or some other waterproof solution.
ikeashark
·9 か月前·議論
How does Figure 03 know if the washer is actually on? I know it has tactile sensors on its fingers but if it tried to press the button and missed how would it know? I know it's probably not by sound.
ikeashark
·9 か月前·議論
100% endorse croc, you can use croc in any GPU renting service (e.g Runpod).
ikeashark
·9 か月前·議論
Anything by my favorite Andy Pavlo is good in my book