HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ironyman

no profile record

投稿

Gatekeeping the Frontier: When AI Access Becomes a National Security Concern

rusi.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·12 日前·0 コメント

What's in America's Code?

boozallen.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·18 日前·0 コメント

Michael Saylor Admits to Using ChatGPT to Build STRC

finance.yahoo.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·21 日前·0 コメント

G7 aims to see China supply no more than 60% of rare earths

mining.com
5 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·23 日前·1 コメント

Palantir wants to 'defend the West,' but the West is wary

france24.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·23 日前·1 コメント

US 'nuclear bros' test America's atomic revival

ft.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·23 日前·2 コメント

China's control over indium phosphide exports threatens AI data centre rollout

reuters.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·28 日前·1 コメント

Musk Looks to an Army of Loyalists to Help Make Him a Trillionaire

wsj.com
8 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·先月·6 コメント

SpaceX IPO demand is approaching four times oversubscribed

reuters.com
11 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·先月·6 コメント

NASA Says Farewell to Maven Mars Mission

nasa.gov
5 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·先月·2 コメント

Elon Musk is expected to become the first trillionaire

nbcnews.com
24 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·先月·5 コメント

The Messy Reality of Building an Empire in Space

wsj.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·先月·1 コメント

Kevin O'leary claims China stirred data-center protests

washingtonpost.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·先月·3 コメント

StoryScope: Investigating Idiosyncrasies in AI Fiction

arxiv.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·先月·0 コメント

Report Alleges Chinese Influence Behind AI Data Center Pushback in the U.S.

dominotheory.com
10 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·2 か月前·1 コメント

Molten Salt Reactors Move Closer to Reality After Breakthrough at U.S. Lab

oilprice.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·2 か月前·0 コメント

America's A.I. Is Futuristic. China Is Just Making It Work

nytimes.com
5 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·2 か月前·2 コメント

The Life and Times of an American Tween

newyorker.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·2 か月前·0 コメント

Offenders sentenced up to 10 years for spying on TSMC

taipeitimes.com
127 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·2 か月前·24 コメント

'The job description is changing': mathematician Terence Tao on the rise of AI

nature.com
6 ポイント·投稿者 ironyman·2 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

ironyman
·23 日前·議論
https://archive.ph/20260618053840/https://www.ft.com/content...
ironyman
·先月·議論
paywall: https://archive.ph/20260610102727/https://www.wsj.com/articl...
ironyman
·先月·議論
paywall: https://archive.ph/20260601043738/https://www.wsj.com/tech/b...
ironyman
·2 か月前·議論
paywall: https://archive.fo/20260509123059/https://www.nytimes.com/20...
ironyman
·3 か月前·議論
paywall: https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.ft.com/content/9e0e0f...
ironyman
·4 か月前·議論
paywall: https://archive.ph/xmr82
ironyman
·5 か月前·議論
paywall: https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.ft.com/content/b92fd9...
ironyman
·5 か月前·議論
DoD believes there is no chance (0%) China would agree to any nuclear treaties until they've hit parity with US/Russia in raw warhead count. And btw, DoD's unclassified assertions about their warhead count is based on old assumptions of their fissile material production and plutonium/tritium availability. In terms of ICBMs, they have production facilities that can make about 90 Peacekeeper-class missiles a year.

In other words, this is less about what China wants and more about where this puts the future nuclear posture of the US.
ironyman
·6 か月前·議論
Because cyber is not a flashy capability like a new jet or missile but it's an area where the US has the clear edge: https://www.iiss.org/research-paper/2021/06/cyber-power---ti...
ironyman
·6 か月前·議論
The Danes would have allowed all those things without the annexation, think new sub pens for our Virginias, Space Force base expansions and so on. There is simply no need to piss off an ally with this nonsense.
ironyman
·6 か月前·議論
Completely different matter. Military concerns aside, the main problem for China there is they know they're absolutely going get killed diplomatically and economically in the aftermath. The leadership knows well what would happen or else they would've done it long ago.
ironyman
·6 か月前·議論
paywall: https://archive.is/XbM4Q
ironyman
·8 か月前·議論
Anthropic probably doesn't have the independent capabilities to perform a full definitive attribution of sophisticated cyberattacks. They likely detected misuse of their tools and then worked with/provided information to the intelligence community (who are familiar with the modus operandi of Chinese APTs) who then did the attribution.
ironyman
·8 か月前·議論
It doesn't really matter how advanced your supercomputing infrastructure is .... the simulation is as good as the input and data from actual tests.

The big question is whether China is confident enough with the data they have from 47 tests.

Any non-subcritical testing is a gift to China as they are severely lagging behind US on number of tests conducted and therefore amount of data collected about warhead design.

Resumption of tests would add fresh data to verify new warhead designs over the decades since the last test. US would have a lesser need for new data given the amount of testing done during the cold war.

If US does conduct a nuclear test I bet a whole slew of test from China would come very shortly after that. Work has already been noticed in recent years in the test tunnel.

https://asia.nikkei.com/static/vdata/infographics/satellite-...
ironyman
·9 か月前·議論
paywall: https://archive.is/kpgMI
ironyman
·10 か月前·議論
paywall: https://archive.is/iW520