HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

jaitsu

no profile record

投稿

GitHub incident: ongoing issues with Actions, Issues and other Git operations

githubstatus.com
204 ポイント·投稿者 jaitsu·3 年前·124 コメント

コメント

jaitsu
·昨年·議論
https://examine.com/supplements/vitamin-d/

This is a good place to get that kind of information
jaitsu
·2 年前·議論
I can't see why they wouldn't be in a future 1.x release
jaitsu
·3 年前·議論
good catch
jaitsu
·3 年前·議論
Indeed, I notice it when trying to push also:

  remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (3/3), completed with 3 local objects.
  remote: fatal error in commit_refs
  To github.com:acme/foo.git
   ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> acme/foo (failure)
  error: failed to push some refs to 'github.com:acme/foo.git'
jaitsu
·3 年前·議論
These two sentences are at completed odds with each other:

1. "We are a company that promotes openness and transparency"

2. "Let's commit to maintaining complete confidentiality about the company—no exceptions"
jaitsu
·3 年前·議論
"X is currently disabled" resolves it
jaitsu
·3 年前·議論
Almost. The sql package is just an abstract layer which requires a 3rd party module to provide the concretions. I guess the API is the same, but you still need a 3rd party lib :)
jaitsu
·4 年前·議論
You can recover from a panic though, so if you are implementing something that may panic you should have some sensible defer/recover in there if you can't afford to have your process crash.
jaitsu
·4 年前·議論
Yeah, no thanks.

Call me old fashioned, but if you really want to see what something looks like on you just go to the store. Personally, I think buying clothes is not just about how they look on you but also how you feel in them. You can't replicate this with a digital solution (yet?).
jaitsu
·4 年前·議論
Very similar thoughts to an article I wrote back in 2014: https://jameshalsall.co.uk/posts/why-soft-deletes-are-evil-a...

Excuse the dramatic title of the post
jaitsu
·4 年前·議論
https://go.dev/blog/supply-chain is a very good write-up on this topic too.
jaitsu
·4 年前·議論
I echo your sentiment.

I am not against gender inclusivity but to call out what is essentially innocent language as inherently “bad” is not a good path to go down.
jaitsu
·4 年前·議論
Given most teams operate CI pipelines on their PRs/MRs, I like to make it a requirement to squash before merging. This means that only passing builds make it into the main branch.

The value of this cannot be underestimated, in my experience, as using things like “git bisect” mean you always have a working build.