HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

jfb

no profile record

投稿

Running local models is good now

vickiboykis.com
1,596 ポイント·投稿者 jfb·25 日前·608 コメント

The Silent Critic

tft.io
13 ポイント·投稿者 jfb·先月·7 コメント

Code review process is theatre

tft.io
6 ポイント·投稿者 jfb·3 か月前·4 コメント

コメント

jfb
·15 日前·議論
The CalDigit TS5+. It's really nice!
jfb
·15 日前·議論
Yeah, I use DAC for the desktop and fibre between floors. It's just the Mac's desktop that uses RJ45 copper.
jfb
·15 日前·議論
Yeah, 10Gb ethernet runs hot. I just rewired the house with 10Gb (we have 8Gb FTTP) and it's kind of upsetting how hot my Thunderbolt dock gets.
jfb
·26 日前·議論
It produces beautiful PDF output from org-mode!
jfb
·29 日前·議論
Postage. Postage. Postage.
jfb
·先月·議論
Yeah there’s a sense in which the approach is a bet on the commoditization of tokens, honestly.
jfb
·先月·議論
Yep! There's a link in the prose, but also:

https://gitlab.com/tftio/tools
jfb
·先月·議論
"cost code" for chrissakes. Sigh.
jfb
·先月·議論
TIL! Thank you!
jfb
·先月·議論
Some thoughts on a world of zero-marginal code code.
jfb
·2 か月前·議論
The tab key in BBEdit inserts a literal tab character, or advances to a tab stop. It doesn't indent the line, which is what I would argue it should do when writing code.
jfb
·2 か月前·議論
I wonder if it will ever get emacs tabs.
jfb
·3 か月前·議論
I think about this has having two separate but related concerns; how do we build tools that focus attention on the parts of the problem where human judgement is highest leverage; and how do we build harnesses that enforce invariants such that humans trust the attention focussing part. It's a challenge!
jfb
·3 か月前·議論
Definitely.
jfb
·3 か月前·議論
Some of my personal thoughts on path dependence in the world of zero marginal cost code.
jfb
·4 か月前·議論
Oh man. I used to use xv a lot. RIP, John.
jfb
·4 か月前·議論
Don't love it. But, I'm glad the Astral folks are getting the bag.
jfb
·7 か月前·議論
I keep my agent workflows distinct; we have (for historic reasons) a lot of non-git controlled context that differs between branches, and moving all that around on checkouts is untenable. I use this tool:

https://github.com/tdhopper/wt

with some custom shell aliases to make it easier.
jfb
·7 か月前·議論
I think it shouldn't be, and the poor affordances in git have hidden this for a long time.
jfb
·7 か月前·議論
That the product is useful does not mean the supplier of the product has a good business; and of course, vice versa. OpenAI has a terrible business at the moment, and the question is, do they have a plausible path to a good one?