I assume you're joking, Either way. One morning when I took the bus to work the bus driver had repeated problems getting the bus to start due to the breathalyser. I heard him complain to the passenger behind him, about it malfunctioning. The passenger volunteered to test this theory, by also blowing into the device. The driver handed him the hose, the passenger gave it a go, the bus started, and the driver shrugged his shoulders, and off we went, only slightly delayed.
It seems perfectly plausible to me that the economic incentives are such that there is no need to "design" any of this, no smoke-filled back room needed.
I wonder why round-trip is such a small concern for people implementing serializers/deserializers of various kinds.
I usually throw in an "Unknown" node type, which stores things unaltered until I can understand things again. The parsers I usually write are very small, so I haven't seen what issues comes up at scale, maybe there are dragons lurking .
No, in logic that is a vacuous truth.
All my hats is true for zero hats. But that would not be a lie. And since the liar always lies, that can not be case.
I'm not sure if this is preventable.