HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

jotux

3,032 カルマ登録 16 年前
jotux.at.hn

コメント

jotux
·4 日前·議論
Love this "auto" truckers hitch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1J8MuOWO0Qs

Edit: Same knot, with an explanation before showing what I knew as the classic trucker hitch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKM5gaYJWN0
jotux
·11 日前·議論
I've had a Brother HL-L2340DW for 10 years now.
jotux
·12 日前·議論
>You should also make sure not to bring your phone to anywhere where a nearby crime is happening because that's all it takes to make you a suspect

Proximity to a crime makes you a suspect even without the phone, right?
jotux
·25 日前·議論
Everyone needs to go transparent. Secrets are lies. Sharing is caring. Privacy is theft.
jotux
·29 日前·議論
How are they for lots of text? Do your eyes fatigue at all?
jotux
·先月·議論
>but I instead bought USB C display glasses

How did you use these? Did you like them?
jotux
·先月·議論
>kind of enthusiastic about just taking stuff from those who have it, considerably more than the current understanding of private property (or even taxation) considers acceptable.

Funny how you can use that description for how AI companies used everything for training data.
jotux
·2 か月前·議論
How would you feel about a machinist refusing to use CNC machines and only manually machining parts?
jotux
·2 か月前·議論
>I just believe that there is going to be a MASSIVE increase in demand for high performing software professionals with experience... we just aren't seeing it right now because of the business cycle.

I'm pretty concerned for early career developers. The industry is failing them by 1) Allowing the early career devs to outsource their critical thinking to AI and 2) Actively hiring fewer early career devs because they're extracting more work from their existing develops with AI. They're failing themselves by relying too much on AI, and not developing those important long-term skills and intuitions.

For that reason I feel pretty safe in my (admittedly niche) career space, and have a similar prediction that in 5-10 years we will have created a experience gap that we can't fix. Experienced engineers with good troubleshooting and debug skills will be even more valuable.
jotux
·2 か月前·議論
Not defending the legitimately douchey things amazon does, but it explains it right in that article :

>In short, an Amazon listing features prices not only offered by Amazon, but by other sellers. Some of these sellers may offer the items at a lower price, but the order will not be fulfilled by Amazon and won’t be subject to Prime’s shipping discounts and faster delivery.

If you're a prime member and logged it, it will prioritize purchases fulfilled by amazon and delivered with prime delivery. If you click "Other sellers on amazon" there will sometimes be sellers that are cheaper with shipping than purchasing through prime.
jotux
·3 か月前·議論
Some info on the new one: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artemis-iis-toile...

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220005710/downloads/NA...
jotux
·3 か月前·議論
>It'll be interesting to see how many people get methanol poisoning from trying their hand at it without doing the research properly.

If you're into home brewing or distilling, the first and only comment people completely unfamiliar with the process say is something about going blind because of methanol. It's disappointing because the process is so rich with history and really interesting problems to solve but the zeitgeist is completely poisoned by prohibition-era propaganda.
jotux
·3 か月前·議論
I rewrote the article, it's even better now:

The tomahawk entered service in 1983, in 2026 they only produced 57. DO THE MATH!

This means the military can only have (2025-1983) * 57 = 2394 Tomahawks.

But the military says they have approximately 3000-4000 tomahawks in inventory. Is it a conspiracy? How could they POSSIBLY have more than 2394 if they can ONLY MAKE 57 PER YEAR?!

prompt: rite me article about US only can make 57 tomohok missels a year but looks lik they have moar than that
jotux
·3 か月前·議論
A better article: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-tomahawks-iran-war-faster-t...

>The maximum rate of production is estimated to be 2,330 per year: Three contracts from Raytheon each have a capacity of 600 and a BAE has a contract to produce up to 530 missiles per year, according to a report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, which cites Pentagon budget documents.

>However, the actual procurement rate for the U.S. military is about 90 per year, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The Navy requested only 57 missiles for fiscal year 2026, according to Defense Department budget documents.

So the rate of production has been low because the procurement rate has been low.
jotux
·4 か月前·議論
>might make Karen suggest to her boss that they accept PDF files.

I'm not sure what state or country this was written in, but requiring physical copies or a fax is very likely a legal requirement.
jotux
·4 か月前·議論
I suspect this is some light with chronically-bad timing that gets run by tons of people every day. The camera is taking a photo with a bunch of vehicles in the frame and it's ticketing the one that had the license plate unobstructed, even if a few of the vehicles in the frame technically entered the intersection when the light was yellow.

Sometimes lights are just so poorly implemented, and drivers pass through them so often, it feels like whoever designed the intersection was actively goading drivers into running the light.
jotux
·4 か月前·議論
Maybe you could reach out to Flock directly and ask them to install cameras in your kitchen and bedroom too (for crime reduction reasons).
jotux
·4 か月前·議論
Meta needs to make a find-your-lost-dog commercial for their smart glasses ASAP.
jotux
·4 か月前·議論
Tariffs, and retaliatory tariffs, have really messed up the US export market for alcohol too.
jotux
·5 か月前·議論
Template metaprogramming, move semantics, const correctness, multiple/virtual inheritance, implicit conversions, many ways to initialize variables, argument-dependent lookup, static variables/methods, SFINAE...add all of that and you'll surely make a programming language beyond all comprehension.