HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

jswny

no profile record

コメント

jswny
·2 か月前·議論
Why not WASM?
jswny
·3 か月前·議論
Codex is fully open source…
jswny
·3 か月前·議論
You want to use the model that is potentially giving your data to the government vs the one that’s openly rejecting that partnership?
jswny
·4 か月前·議論
Package a skill with your CLI itself and give users instructions on how to install the skill properly. That allows the agent to read the instructions in a context efficient way when it wants to use the CLI
jswny
·4 か月前·議論
Plenty of MCPs require you to install and run them locally, like I said remote MCP has a real advantage over CLI tho
jswny
·4 か月前·議論
MCP loads all tools immediately. CLI does not because it’s not auto exposed to the agent, got have more control of how the context of which tools exist, and how to deliver that context.
jswny
·4 か月前·議論
MCP is fine, particular remote MCP which is the lowest friction way to get access to some hosted service with auth handled for you.

However, MCP is context bloat and not very good compared to CLIs + skills mechanically. With a CLI you get the ability to filter/pipe (regular Unix bash) without having to expand the entire tool call every single time in context.

CLIs also let you use heredoc for complex inputs that are otherwise hard to escape.

CLIs can easily generate skills from the —help output, and add agent specific instructions on top. That means you can give the agent all the instructions it needs to know how to use the tools, what tools exist, lazy loaded, and without bloating the context window with all the tools upfront (yes, I know tool search in Claude partially solves this).

CLIs also don’t have to run persistent processes like MCP but can if needed
jswny
·5 か月前·議論
Can you explain what’s so different about pro?

I’ve used everything frontier model and had Pro a while ago but it seemed to just be the same models served faster at the time.
jswny
·5 か月前·議論
How do you get sub agents to work?
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
That’s just spawning multiple parallel explore agents instructed to look at different things, and then compiling results

That’s a pretty basic functionality in Claude code
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
What’s the point of having a public GitHub repo with PRs enabled if they will never merge any of them?
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
How do you know/toggle which API path you are using?
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
How does this work for other models that aren’t OpenAI models
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
Ah I think it’s because I was testing with an external library in the top level TOML metadata
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
The problem is that only Deno can type check single file scripts. Otherwise with Node and Bun you need a project to use tsc. Python can type check single file scripts (even with PEP 723 deps) with ty. Otherwise, I love TS for scripting, especially with Bun shell
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
I wish this was faster, in my tests it’s about 200ms startup consistently on my M4 MacBook. Otherwise very cool
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
Bun has a lot of this built in, plus Bun shell
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
Not memory, I just instruct it to freely experiment with temporary scripts and artifacts in a specific folder.

This helps it organize temporary things it does like debugging scripts and lets it (or me) reference/build on them later, without filling the context window. Nothing fancy, just a bit of organization that collects in a repo (Git ignored)
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
Can you give an example of how beads would be used by Claude to do something it otherwise couldn’t? I can’t quite tell what it is useful for
jswny
·6 か月前·議論
I also specifically instruct Claude how to use a globally git ignored scratch folder “tmp” in each repo. Curious what your approach is