HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

kernalix7

no profile record

投稿

Show HN: WinPodX – run Windows apps on Linux, VM looks like real hardware

winpodx.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 kernalix7·15 日前·0 コメント

Show HN: AIPS – A Claude Code plugin to stop re-doing AI setup every project

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 kernalix7·2 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: One Markdown File to Set Up Claude, Codex, Cursor and Copilot

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 kernalix7·2 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Rdprrap – Rust Port of RDPWrap (Multi-Session RDP for Windows Desktop)

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 kernalix7·2 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Winpodx – run Windows apps on Linux as native windows

github.com
98 ポイント·投稿者 kernalix7·2 か月前·49 コメント

コメント

kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Now it supports reverse-open
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
maybe it runs, but gpu hardware accel doesn't support now.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
yeah from user side it feels like that. but technically its more like extremely user-friendly way of using VMs.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
For now single container runs all softwares. tradeoff with dockur/windows limits, saves ram and disk. planning multi container later for better isolation.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Just at the planning stage, needs careful consideration first.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
yeah.. I also agreed with that. so I'll optimize the code continuously and lower the dependency on python. but for now I'll keep it because of some benefits.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Thanks for your opinion, i ll try my best!
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
God it, i ll follow the guidelines, Thanks for the pointer. Apologies..
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
That's my mistake. I just focused on the functionally working, so I missed that point.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
The Korean intent is mine, but I run it through an LLM to phrase in English. That's where the pattern comes from. Will skip the LLM step from here.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Fair, English isn't my first language and I've been leaning on tooling. I'll dial it back.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Fair point. Working on it now — will push a screenshot and short clip soon.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Right, I had WinApps pinned to dockur in that comparison and missed the IP-based flexibility part. That's an actual difference, will fix the README.

On Python: fair pushback. Picked it for stdlib coverage (zero runtime deps on 3.11+, one tomli fallback for 3.9/3.10) and iteration speed. Heavy lifting is in the container and FreeRDP so perf hasn't been the bottleneck, but yeah the language choice is a tradeoff.

Reverse file association is interesting, hadn't thought about that direction. The v0.3.0 agent could probably handle it but I'd want to look at the security model first. Marking it TBD. If you open an issue with the use case that'd help me scope it.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Good to know, didn't realize Mikrotik did this too. Useful for homelab planning where rack space and airflow actually matter.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
The fan body itself follows standard 120/140mm dimensions, but I needed the smaller details for my design, the rubber dampers, anti-vibration corners, cable routing clips. Those don't show up cleanly in the datasheet, so I ended up using a caliper. That's the part the official CAD would have helped most with.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Would have saved me time on a 3D printer I designed a while back. I integrated Noctua fans and ended up measuring mounting dimensions by hand. Having the official CAD models would have made fan integration a lot cleaner.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
The Excel flip lands. AI is a tool. People could adapt and use it, instead a lot of the panic sounds like resistance dressed up as analysis.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Codeberg / Forgejo are also out there as less radical alternatives, so the choice space isn't binary. But the discoverability gap is real, and so is the loss of all the surrounding infrastructure people don't always think about. CI runners, release hosting, container registry, security advisories. You can replace each of those individually, but doing it all at once is a significant maintenance burden for projects with limited maintainer time.
kernalix7
·2 か月前·議論
Self-hostable legal AI as open source is a useful direction in principle. Hard to tell how mature the actual implementation is though, the repo is pretty fresh and the marketing site is doing a lot of heavy lifting compared to what's in the code right now. Will be more interesting to revisit in a few weeks.