kobe26 · HackerTrans

How exactly do you fix the reputation of a system that previously claimed unlinkable transactions that is now essentially deanonimized, with some of those users DN users? Everything is ok now and users should have confidence in these people, including G. Maxwell?

kobe26

9 年前議論

Take this as a prime example of the corruption that has become the defacto behavior of a small but very influential group of Bitcoin developers.

Greg has been promoting Monero since it's inception, a cryptocurrency advertised as being unlinkable.

T addresses in ZEC were NEVER STATED TO BE PRIVATE.

The argument that Monero transactions being found to be linkable at a wide range of mixins, as demonstrated by the paper and the search facility on http://monerolink.com, is somehow comparable to ZCash NON PRIVATE transactions between T addresses, is essentially academic fraud, which is in many ways the norm for people so jaded by the pursuit of profit - Yes, Greg is a Monero holder.

Greg, as you continue to flap around this issue presenting such fallacious arguments to essentially cover your own incompetence, and an incompetence that potentially could have cost many people their own privacy and security by promoting such a defunct privacy system, please understand that most people are not this easily fooled and your own credibility is permanently tainted in this regard, as it very well should be.

I would add that the additional argument being floated on this issue, that this major flaw is fixed now and doesn't matter, is another case of academic fraud; Any system that has is misrepresented for so long (May 2014- Jan 2017) at the cost of user's privacy and once a "fix" such as CT is applied to then say this system is sound is another pathetic attempt by dishonest academics to cover the incompetence and protect their reputations and personal financial interests.

Bitcoin was intended to fight corruption and the influence of corrupt "officials".

It is time for change.

コメント