HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ksajadi

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·先月·0 コメント

Ask HN: Why Reddit blocks all automated access but has .json for all URLs?

5 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·2 か月前·10 コメント

Rails, Security and AI Reports

tenderlovemaking.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·2 か月前·1 コメント

Show HN: OIFI Databook: An intelligence database of Iran's power structure

databook.oifi.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·3 か月前·0 コメント

Native macOS Multi Agent Development UI

super.engineering
4 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·3 か月前·4 コメント

S3 Files

aws.amazon.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·3 か月前·0 コメント

Claude is having another moment, again

downdetector.co.uk
24 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·3 か月前·2 コメント

The PaaS Graveyard: Why Platforms Keep Dying and Developers Keep Migrating

blog.cloud66.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·5 か月前·3 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·7 か月前·0 コメント

Frank Gehry has died

bbc.co.uk
193 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·7 か月前·68 コメント

Our 10 Rules of using Coding Agents

blog.cloud66.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·8 か月前·0 コメント

Daniel Ek steps down as Spotify CEO

bbc.com
6 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·9 か月前·0 コメント

A computer upgrade shut down BART

bart.gov
234 ポイント·投稿者 ksajadi·10 か月前·363 コメント

コメント

ksajadi
·9 日前·議論
Meta: Can someone more familiar with the rules of HN please tell me why some Show HN posts get immediately “flagged” while others don’t? I have seen commercial entires like this be flagged while this one is on the first page.
ksajadi
·10 日前·議論
Genuine question: why was this post flagged. what rule does it violate?
ksajadi
·18 日前·議論
Cannot agree more. As part of our SOC2 we have to log and respond to all inbound vulnerability reports. Before it was easy to tell if a report was just a bounty hunter looking for a low hanging fruit. Now well crafted emails with seemingly legitimate disclosures take a lot of time to validate and triage.

Our solution was to build a tool that uses LLMs to assess the report before it gets to us. Honestly I wish we didn’t have to do this but it works and has really allowed us to spend our time on the actual good reports. (Feel free to check it out at fortworx.com if you want)
ksajadi
·22 日前·議論
For our metrics and autoscaling engine at Cloud 66, we went through 5 iterations before settling on Clickhouse: 1. Redis 2. Cassandra 3. Handrolled: Ruby + RabbitMQ 4. Handrolled: Go + RabbitMQ 5. Clickhouse

Every time we reached some limit or huge optimization burdens that were unfeasible. Clickhouse has been rock solid for the past 4 years.
ksajadi
·先月·議論
In a previous life I used to model insurance payouts for residential mortgages. The average we used was within 7 years.
ksajadi
·先月·議論
Very interesting. Anecdotally I’ve found the opposite to be the case. But I’m very interested in understanding more. Thanks for sharing
ksajadi
·先月·議論
that's an interesting approach and something i also considered (using git to avoid conflicts). one thing i needed was a "database" (basically a folder of markdowns) with a fixed schema so i can let the agents record their decisions in (for example when the code conflicts with product design spec). this combined with search has been a real lifesaver.

this is how it works: https://help.markbase.cloud/humans/collections/overview
ksajadi
·先月·議論
I tend to agree with the rest of the commenters that the most likely outcome is that harnesses will include features like this. I had a slightly different issue and that was 'project-level memory' that i can use across models or harnesses (chat, claude code, etc).

for a while i used Obsidian but it was not very good with hosted tools like claude.ai then i moved to a combination of Linear and Notion. Still using Linear but Notion ended up being a royal pain: it is built for humans not agents. It is block based and when multiple agents use it there is a lot of corruption in the process.

I wanted a markdown only, notion built for agents that can work with multiple agents so built one: markbase.cloud

feel free to try and use it. i think it's useful
ksajadi
·先月·議論
This.^ I realized this first when moving a design spec from Claude chat to Claude Code and panicked. I literally had to build something like Notion but for agents to act as a portable memory between all cloud and local models and agents. But honestly it paid off!

If you are interested you can try it out at markbase.cloud (disclaimer and all that). I am not charging for it.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
I just want to say thank you for all your good work. We are very proud to have been a small part of your efforts at Cloud 66. Keep up the good work.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
sometimes I feel we need to hire someone just to catch up with google breaking changes.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
When you signup for Railway, they have uncommon way of making sure you have read and understood their T&C regarding abuse of their systems, including crypto mining, etc.

My guess is that many are abusing their free tier, causing them trouble with their service providers.

I take no joy in seeing Railway take a hit like this, even as a competitor, but free compute attracts all sorts of strange users. We've been there and decided early on to avoid free compute even it costs us our top of the funnel.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
That is a good hypothesis but then you’d imagine they could combine it with registered clients to keep crawlers accountable.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
Overall, it's an interesting idea. Although it's Google and it's packed, it's going to be packed with Gemini and Google AI and whatnot. My problem is not the AI, nor is it that it's an undefined territory for what a laptop use case is. My problem is Google's attention span. Google is notoriously bad at paying attention to any product for more than 18 months. I'm not going to spend money on buying a piece of hardware where it's going to be totally irrelevant from a manufacturing point of view in 18 months and be left high and dry holding the bag.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
It's turned into a bizarre place. Today I asked the same question on /r/meta and my question was immediately removed without explanation. I tried to message the mods and got bounced with a "you cannot send a message to that user"
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
We certainly see a lot more automated security vulnerability reports coming our way that are clearly generated by AI and in bulk.

As a SOC 2 compliant company we have to record each one and respond to them as per our policies.

Our solution was to use AI to combat that as the first line of defence and filtering. Eventually we turned this system into a separate business (fortworx.com) because it seems a lot of other companies have the same problem.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
Looks good! Do you have an MCP or API in your roadmap? The reason: managing a lot of templates and their placeholders can get out of hand pretty quickly and agents can be a good way to deal with the complexity.

I'd love to try this with sendops.dev although I'm not sure how it's going to work with the git backed templating it has.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
Just woke up to this. Not sure if I’m reading this right. So this is the same company that puts up Captcha pages all over the internet?
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
I'm going to plug Cloud 66 here for you as well. You get a happy middle between a fully managed PaaS and running your own servers.
ksajadi
·2 か月前·議論
Zed is a really good editor in an age that every other editor has forgotten to be about *editing* and wants to be a wrapper around coding agents.

On the agent side, I really like their ACP approach but for now it seems buggy and limited in functionality (previous message editing, occasionally never-ending work, ...)