HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

kvthweatt

no profile record

投稿

Need Some Testers

3 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·2 か月前·9 コメント

Python and C killer seekers rejoice

2 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·3 か月前·1 コメント

Show HN: Flux: A systems language with endianness in the type system

4 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·4 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·5 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·5 か月前·0 コメント

Ask HN: Help with LLVM

33 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·6 か月前·9 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·6 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·7 か月前·0 コメント

Un-Redactor

github.com
56 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·7 か月前·52 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 kvthweatt·7 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

kvthweatt
·2 か月前·議論
This is my point. You could go check it out.
kvthweatt
·2 か月前·議論
Seems like every time I ask nicely nothing happens.

Also this is not "switch to my language" it's please provide feedback.
kvthweatt
·2 か月前·議論
hmm looks like there's actually something to interact with this time around.

This is implying I must spend my time here and be your friend just to get feedback.

I have other places to be and other things to do. I don't come here to read up, I come here to share. Some come to read up. Some come to comment and provide feedback.

I'm too busy spending my time developing my language with no one asking questions for me to answer.
kvthweatt
·2 か月前·議論
zero copy structs? no?

not even if i said it was real and verifiable? no?

fuck it right fuck my work.
kvthweatt
·3 か月前·議論
Can now do:

```

#import "standard.fx";

using standard::io::console;

def main() -> int

{

    i16 x = 0b1011010011110100;

    data{6} as u6;

    u6 y = x[0``5];

    if (y in x)

    {

        println("Success!");

    };

    return 0;
};

```
kvthweatt
·5 か月前·議論
Over the last month I've done an insane amount of work, and the compiler has matured enough I can safely start expanding the standard library. As of today we now have a minimal crypto library with SHA256, AES-128 (FIPS 197 compliant!), and MD5 to start.

There are plenty of working examples to try along with tests.

Note that only x86_64 is supported currently and I'm working to support more architectures, as well as provide better support for Darwin.

If anyone finds the language interesting and would like to help, I could really use testers for different operating systems and architectures so I can add ABI-specific stuff to the standard library to extend support.

tl;dr we now have basic IO (console,file,sockets) and basic cryptography. I built this language in approximately 9 months also.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
Give it a shot and tell me what you think of it.

Currently in the pre-bootstrap phase, the reduced specification is almost fully implemented.

While missing some parts still, you can write Turing-complete programs, mainly because you have the ability to write inline ASM.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
Added the ability to auto unredact and generate HTML from your PDF files.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
My point being if it is properly and truly unredacted, then it's the truth.

The CYA is just me saying I'm not responsible for anything anyone makes, because anyone can make a document say anything with this tool.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
I fixed all the issues in the tool.

It works now.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
Just fixed it, try it again.

Added images to show the tool in action.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
Well what are they gonna do tell me take the tool down? Too late.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
New info dropped:

The redactions by DOJ are so sloppy that you can COPY AND PASTE blocks of text to a new text editor and see the "redacted" text beneath.

Try it yourself.

They did not properly redact many documents.

It's about to get wild.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
Precisely. The tool is neutral.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
You do you but I advise you don't.

Standard CYA procedure

For all we know, Epstein could have punished Trump and made him write "I'm a little bitch boy" 2,000 times and it took up 119 pages so every line got redacted. /madlibs
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
This just attempts to match box dimensions.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
That's the point though. You cannot just write anything and put it up.

It must be accurate. Even that being said, you still shouldn't reupload your altered document anywhere.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
Either way, fixed or with index lines.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
Yes.
kvthweatt
·7 か月前·議論
The point is you can perform a box dimension attack.

If you have a known input, you can match all outputs.

Example: Document that DOJ took down and reuploaded that redacted Trump's name when it was previously available. They used the same size boxes in each location.

You cannot do this with handwriting, but fonts have known widths.