HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

latenightcoding

no profile record

コメント

latenightcoding
·11 日前·議論
I skimmed through it, what makes you think it is slop?
latenightcoding
·16 日前·議論
not even close, because there are a lot of places where you can't run LuaJIT
latenightcoding
·2 か月前·議論
>> Gen AI ARchive

isn't this a nightmare for privacy
latenightcoding
·2 か月前·議論
building a UI was so easy.
latenightcoding
·4 か月前·議論
[deleted]
latenightcoding
·4 か月前·議論
what filters are you using to find the papers, anyone you enjoyed/recommend?
latenightcoding
·4 か月前·議論
and they only got really good like last December.
latenightcoding
·5 か月前·議論
I never hijack non-ai threads to talk about AI, but can anybody share their experience using LLMs to code in Coq, Lean, etc.
latenightcoding
·5 か月前·議論
working in software before LLMs, you had to be there.
latenightcoding
·7 か月前·議論
What I wonder is: are current LLMs even good for the type of work he does: novel, low-level, extremely performant
latenightcoding
·7 か月前·議論
totally forgot about Magic Leap
latenightcoding
·7 か月前·議論
when the core devs lose money, the rules change.
latenightcoding
·8 か月前·議論
>> More hands is usually better than simpler systems for reasons that have nothing to do with technical proficiency.

If you are working on open source databases, or something close to the metal I agree with antirez, if you are working at some established tech business (e.g: a very old ecommerce site), I agree with you
latenightcoding
·8 か月前·議論
when I used to crawl the web, battle tested Perl regexes were more reliable than anything else, commented urls would have been added to my queue.
latenightcoding
·2 年前·議論
It isn't more popular because it's not easy to use it properly.

I haven't touched it in years so I can't expand, but when I did, I had to write so many wrappers and add extra logic to use it properly.
latenightcoding
·5 年前·議論
code is law until core devs lose money.
latenightcoding
·5 年前·議論
They have been very secretive and didn't have a working website until recent, we will have to wait and see!

When it comes to quantum computing companies I do think it's best to take any of their claims with a grain of salt by default.