HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

levn11

no profile record

投稿

An Interesting Proof

techrxiv.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 levn11·2 年前·1 コメント

Ask HN: I would like an honest discussion about this math proof?

archive.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 levn11·3 年前·2 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 levn11·3 年前·0 コメント

コメント

levn11
·8 か月前·議論
my life: https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·昨年·議論
i mean https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer......
levn11
·2 年前·議論
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 年前·議論
so how much do you just stare at grass and yell at the sky
levn11
·2 年前·議論
I would make food shelters and start a school, a dream of mine.
levn11
·2 年前·議論
it follows specifically from the form on pages 1-3. i would recommend reading it with fresh eyes after a good night's rest.
levn11
·2 年前·議論
I won't reply further to this question about g, i do think i've been clear. and at this point you can be on your merry way still thinking it's wrong. but you simply misunderstood.
levn11
·2 年前·議論
it's a proof by contradiction. g would divide a+b-c IF a+b-c are integers.

for n=2, g(2)=(c-a)(c-b)g_1(2) and g_1(2)=2.

So only when n=2 is it true that g divides a+b-c.

Otherwise we get a contradiction that it divides. since then, g_1(n) for n>2 is not a factor of a+b-c, we can safely assume at least one of them was not an integer.
levn11
·2 年前·議論
i believe you skipped pages 1-3. g_1(2)=2 for all a,b,c with n=2. g(n) carries with it the assumption of a^n+b^n=c^n as i showed in pages 1-3.
levn11
·2 年前·議論
This is only true for a,b,c that satisfies a^2+b^2=c^2.

So a=b=3 and c=n=2 is not part of the solution set.
levn11
·2 年前·議論
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 年前·議論
which part
levn11
·2 年前·議論
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 年前·議論
Exactly. I have my degree as well, so I was doing some research of my own. It’s an ongoing thing.
levn11
·2 年前·議論
techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170629872.29614231/v1
levn11
·2 年前·議論
Seems like some kind of novel approach. Looks right to me. But my math is okay, so I need better eyes.
levn11
·2 年前·議論
https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Fermat_s_Last_and_the...
levn11
·3 年前·議論
PLEASE read this as this is literally about thinking of center of mass as existing in more than 0 dimensions. the book is called The Zero Point Paradox and has everything to do about singularities
levn11
·3 年前·議論
They did nothing, apparently. Just kept on keeping on
levn11
·3 年前·議論
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Remote: yes

Willing to relocate: maybe

Technologies: i have a masters in applied math, i know python, i wrote a book, and i am publishing a math proof. But im also in need of employment.

Resume: I will email resume upon request, apologies i dont have a url set up for it.

Email: [email protected]