HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

lightbendover

537 カルマ登録 10 年前

コメント

lightbendover
·一昨日·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·一昨日·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·28 日前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·28 日前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·7 か月前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·7 か月前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·8 か月前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·8 か月前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·8 か月前·議論
[dead]
lightbendover
·3 年前·議論
Every company should go to ridiculous lengths to avoid rewrites. Rewrites of significant tech (as a proxy, lets say 100+ kloc) spell doom. Doom.
lightbendover
·3 年前·議論
https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... isn't too far removed from some of what I've seen in big tech, especially architecture-wise. Certainly less costly absurdity.
lightbendover
·3 年前·議論
> the billion dollar mistake

Eh, a billion dollars isn't too bad.
lightbendover
·3 年前·議論
Also big tech, we ask senior candidates both hypothetical systems and ones they have experience with.
lightbendover
·3 年前·議論
> No one is working with a huge amount of data in big loops using virtual methods to take every element out of a huge dataset like he is showing.

Things way worse than that exist. Replace "virtual method" with "service call."