HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

madawei2699

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·29 日前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·2 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·4 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·4 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: AI-Native Architecture Series (Open-Source)

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·5 か月前·3 コメント

Show HN: I Stopped Writing Code – The 60/40 Rule for AI-Native Engineering

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·5 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Constrained DSL for Reliable LLM Decisions

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·5 か月前·1 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·昨年·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·昨年·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 madawei2699·2 年前·0 コメント

コメント

madawei2699
·29 日前·議論
[flagged]
madawei2699
·5 か月前·議論
Thanks JB_5000 — really appreciate you putting it that way. You're spot on: the whole point is constraints over intelligence. Guardrails (DSL, schema, deterministic replay, boring hybrid) are what actually make it production-usable.

On scaling: so far it's handling ~3k trial users + growing paid base with low four-digit RMB yearly infra (queue-driven scale-to-zero, Redis cache, R2 for artifacts). The real bottleneck is still alignment quality (good artifacts + human gates), not the constraint overhead itself. Haven't hit hard walls yet, but I'm sure 10x–100x load will expose new ones.

How about you? Have you seen constrained agents / deterministic layers scale well (or break) at larger sizes? Any guardrails that worked surprisingly well for you?

Thanks again!
madawei2699
·2 年前·議論
A Chrome extension powered by AI to generate quick summaries of community discussions. Get insights from lengthy threads without reading through everything.