HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

madsushi

770 カルマ登録 14 年前
https://www.chasechristian.com

IT and Networking

Currently @ Valve

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/madsushi; my proof: https://keybase.io/madsushi/sigs/GjHBBWk7qKbixcn2FWlb0k4ZBeMyMTe4_l11uWfrS68 ]

コメント

madsushi
·14 日前·議論
It costs ~$200,000 to apply for a TLD, and there's an ongoing renewal cost in the tens of thousands of USD.
madsushi
·7 か月前·議論
Thanks for sharing. Although 'Boromir' and 'One does not simply' should absolutely be a match!
madsushi
·7 か月前·議論
“There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses.” ― Bjarne Stroustrup
madsushi
·8 か月前·議論
There's an expansion port on the front with a camera interface, so you could add on better AR cameras.
madsushi
·8 か月前·議論
There's an expansion port on the front with a camera interface, so you could add on better AR cameras.
madsushi
·8 か月前·議論
I think it's tongue-in-cheek.
madsushi
·8 か月前·議論
The finances work the other way around: you can often pay your transit/upstream providers an additional fee for their DDOS protection/filtering service, where you can signal (via BGP or otherwise) that there's traffic you don't want to receive. BGP Flowspec (or similar) is one of the technologies used here.
madsushi
·9 か月前·議論
Yep, absolutely, often called "wave/wavelength" or "lambda" service, or "lit fiber".
madsushi
·10 か月前·議論
DWDM tech improvements have outpaced nearly every other form of technology growth, so the same single pair of fiber that used to carry 10 Mbps can now carry 20 Tbps, which is a 2,000,000x multiplier. The same somewhat-fixed supply of fiber can go a very long way today, so the price pressure for access is less than you might expect.
madsushi
·10 か月前·議論
All surface area carries risk, and LLDP is additional surface area when exposed on a public IX.
madsushi
·11 か月前·議論
Depending on the streaming protocol (eg WARP), you can specify that the tracks (audio vs video) need to be time-aligned, so each group (chunk of video or audio) starts at the same time and lasts the same length. I think this means you'll get resync'd at the start of the next group.
madsushi
·11 か月前·議論
Thanks for the info! I was reading up on CMAF after seeing it mentioned on your blog.
madsushi
·11 か月前·議論
Related, the WARP streaming protocol, as a candidate for what would ride over MoQ: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-moq-warp/