HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

mandelbrotwurst

1,355 カルマ登録 9 年前

コメント

mandelbrotwurst
·8 か月前·議論
Why would the fact that it failed to follow one instruction increase the likelihood that it failed to follow others within the same response?
mandelbrotwurst
·11 か月前·議論
Those conversations are an important part of the job. You can, for example, agree that something works in the sense that it is currently possible to use it to obtain a desired output, while simultaneously failing to work in various ways: It might fail to do so reliably, or it might only be able to do so at great cost.
mandelbrotwurst
·5 年前·議論
Out of curiosity, where are you located?
mandelbrotwurst
·5 年前·議論
Was he actually doing nothing?
mandelbrotwurst
·6 年前·議論
Yeah, that's exactly much what I was thinking, that when you take a look at their activities, it's clear that the definition of what's considered political here is fairly narrow.

Re: your hypothesis, after learning about 501c4s from Jeff in this thread and reading about for 10 seconds on Wikipedia, it seems that those actually serve that purpose quite well ("super PACs" are apparently 501c4), so I don't think the 501c3s are highly likely to get used in that way.
mandelbrotwurst
·6 年前·議論
Oh, interesting, thanks. The only one I verified before posting was EFF, and I hadn't heard of a 501c4 previously.
mandelbrotwurst
·6 年前·議論
Coinbase is far from unregulated, they're subject to and enforce the same KYC rules that banks do, go ahead and try to buy some BTC there anonymously and see how far you get.
mandelbrotwurst
·6 年前·議論
Wait, really? Dont many (most?) 501c3s have highly political missions? E.g. EFF, ACLU, NRA?
mandelbrotwurst
·6 年前·議論
I think about this in terms of how much clock time has elapsed versus how much working time I spend on something - i.e. I am very often able to trade an increase in clock time elapsed (taking more breaks) for a decrease in working time, and vice versa.

As with most things, this comes with diminishing returns as you push toward minimizing one over the other.

Sometimes, even negative returns, e.g. because of increased context switching costs, or confusion and general malaise caused by staring at something for too long.
mandelbrotwurst
·6 年前·議論
When you've invested that much into something you're not very likely to suddenly decide to make that sort of strategic blunder for giggles.
mandelbrotwurst
·6 年前·議論
Wow, that does sound great! Are they doing that in store only (like separate bins?), online, or both?
mandelbrotwurst
·7 年前·議論
Makes sense. I suppose no need trying to quantify more specifically if we're nowhere near that line.
mandelbrotwurst
·7 年前·議論
Yeah, that came to mind for me as well / seems like a pretty serious drawback to say the least.
mandelbrotwurst
·7 年前·議論
Thanks!
mandelbrotwurst
·7 年前·議論
Thanks, sorry, misread. Was asking because am curious about how the deaths break down overall as this would affect what we might want to focus on when attempting to reduce them.
mandelbrotwurst
·7 年前·議論
@Causalityl , @jranmer - question for both of you (or whoever) - at what rate of death if any would it become appropriate to do these types of drills and why?
mandelbrotwurst
·7 年前·議論
Do you know what the composition of the other 98% looks like? i.e. accidental firings at home, murders, suicides, etc?
mandelbrotwurst
·7 年前·議論
Agree with your general point, but:

1. There were children born before you with frightened helicopter parents and there will be children born tomorrow who grow up with more freedom than you did. Generational experience is not homogenous.

2. Current trends do not set our future paths into stone, and it is possible that we will be able to plant seeds to move things in freer, saner directions going forward.