HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

manunamz

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 manunamz·3 か月前·0 コメント

Does the Platypus Have Nipples?

wibomd.substack.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 manunamz·3 か月前·3 コメント

Show HN: Cultivation > Accumulation (For AI Agentic Memory)

wibomd.substack.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 manunamz·4 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: WikiBonsai - A Legible Knowledge Layer

wibomd.substack.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 manunamz·4 か月前·0 コメント

Mental Model Discovery

wibomd.substack.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 manunamz·4 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

manunamz
·3 か月前·議論
Substack was auto-forwarding for a while so I thought it would be fine...But I guess url-forwarding is temporary.
manunamz
·3 か月前·議論
Exactly. Traditional library science truly captured deep patterns of information architecture.

https://x.com/wibomd/status/1818305066303910006

Pixar got this right in Ralph Wrecks The Internet.

https://x.com/wibomd/status/1827067434794127648
manunamz
·4 か月前·議論
Very cool project. How are you thinking about indexing and discoverability? Git gives you the change history, but navigating the corpus itself seems like the harder problem: Finding related laws, understanding hierarchical relationships between statutes...

Have you considered embedding semantic hierarchical structure directly in the markdown? Something like https://github.com/wikibonsai/semtree ? It lets you build a navigable tree across markdown files using indented [[wikilinks]] as the organizational spine. Could be a natural fit for legislation that already has an inherent taxonomy (constitutional → organic → ordinary, or by subject area).
manunamz
·4 年前·議論
This is a nice write-up.

I agree with other comments here too, which mention not necessarily needing to hit all points on this list. If working alone, or quickly prototyping, they may not be strictly necessary. It's about trade-offs: The more people involved or the longer one goes without re-visiting a project, the more important these bullets become.

If there isn't a pre-established standard, it's useful to run a mental "commit hook" that evaluates the usefulness, or future likelihood of usefulness, of these items.