matvore · HackerTrans

6 か月前議論

  > Obviously the proper solution is to adjust your system thermal management / power targets,

My point is that I understand the users' complaint and request for a revert, not that I can't address this for my own machines. The proper solution for non-technical people is to ask the expert to fix it, which may include undoing the change if they were never interested in the process finishing faster anyway.

I did solve this problem once upon a time by running the process in a cgroup with limited CPU, though I later rewrote my dwm config and lost the command, without caring enough to maintain the fix.

matvore

6 か月前議論

If the fan was turning on where it wasn't before, it seems like cooling was once happening through natural dissipation, but after your fix it needed fans to cool faster. So the fix saved time but burnt extra electricity (and the peacefulness of a quiet room.)

This is pretty easy to understand IMO. About 70% of the time I hear machine's fans speed up I silently wish the processing would have just been slower. This is especially true for very short bursts of activity.

matvore

昨年議論

  > all of the languages mentioned so far appear before the "Latin alphabet" 
  > style languages, but 閩南語 and 閩東語 appear after them.

Could it have something to do with Minnan and Mindong Chinese articles being written in a Latin script, (despite the language name showing in both Chinese characters and Latin letters) ?

matvore

昨年議論

The Wikipedia sort for the languages is as I stated above, with Literary Chinese and Japanese between Wu Chinese and Yue Chinese. I explained why it was sorted that way, because radical is considered first. You could not explain why Japanese appeared between Wu and Yue because you insisted and continue to insist that radicals are not used.

I didn't say sorting is never done by stroke count alone. But I have seen radical+residual stroke count much more often than stroke count alone. Probably a result of the content I'm accessing. It's mostly Japanese and not intended for children.

The dictionary and non-dictionary sorting distinction that you make doesn't sound like a real thing. The audience, the country, and the number of items sorted are bigger factors. But you're not wrong in that stroke count is sometimes used alone.

matvore

昨年議論

It is sorted FIRST by radical and SECOND by stroke order. This is roughly equivalent to the Unicode codepoint sort if you stay in the basic multilingual plane. The order also puts literary chinese afer wu Chinese, which breaks with a pure stroke-count sort:

中文 - 中 = 丨 + 3 strokes

吴语 - 吴 = 口 + 4 strokes

文言 - 文 = 文 + 0 strokes

日本語 - 日 = 日 + 0 strokes

粵語 - 粵 = 米 + 7 strokes

コメント