HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

medhir

no profile record

投稿

Your phone is an entire computer

medhir.com
367 ポイント·投稿者 medhir·4 か月前·313 コメント

コメント

medhir
·先月·議論
[dead]
medhir
·2 か月前·議論
It’s amazing to scroll through this whole product page and leave feeling like I don’t know what it really does / who it’s for.

Why are these features compelling? I went through the whole page and still don’t know what OS runs on this laptop… the value prop for this is incredibly unclear.
medhir
·4 か月前·議論
taps the sign: https://medhir.com/blog/right-to-root-access
medhir
·4 か月前·議論
It’s definitely speculation. Not sure it’s unfounded, the project has built some level of support for all other Apple Silicon Macs: https://asahilinux.org/docs/platform/feature-support/overvie...
medhir
·4 か月前·議論
Perhaps it is the way I framed the article, but the core of my argument is not “MacOS on iPhone”.

Yes, I do personally desire that as a niche thing, but the broader point is the nature of a locked bootloader that prevents any third-party software from being loaded / installed without getting an approval from Apple.

Whether the desire is third party apps on iOS outside of Apple-vetted channels, or entirely new operating systems like Linux or MacOS, I’m mainly arguing I should have the right to modify the software however I’d like as the device owner.
medhir
·4 か月前·議論
My contention is that the definition of said product and its inherent capabilities is being gatekept by a corporation that would love you to buy both an iPhone and Mac, and treat them as separate. In fact, I do have both already! But I still want rights to modify my iPhone as the computer it is.

The MacBook Neo is a great example of just how fungible these categories are, at least as far as the SoC that runs them is concerned. I paid for my iPhone in full, there is no reasonable justification for why I can’t repurpose it / modify it as I see fit.
medhir
·4 か月前·議論
No exactly, Apple is playing in our faces, all while people continue to defend the “differences” of device categories and the subsequent justification of shipping iPhones and iPads with locked bootloaders.
medhir
·4 か月前·議論
Now that MacOS has been demonstrated to run on an A-Series chip, can we please finally get unlocked bootloaders to run MacOS on other iDevices?
medhir
·6 か月前·議論
https://medhir.com :)
medhir
·7 か月前·議論
wow — this hit me hard.

I live in Seattle, and got laid off from Microsoft as a PM in Jan of this year.

Tried in early 2024 to demonstrate how we could leverage smaller models (such as Mixtral) to improve documentation and tailor code samples for our auth libraries.

The usual “fiefdom” politics took over and the project never gained steam. I do feel like I was put in a certain “non-AI” category and my career stalled, even though I took the time to build AI-integrated prototypes and present them to leadership.

It’s hard to put on a smile and go through interviews right now. It feels like the hard-earned skills we bring to the table are being so hastily devalued, and for what exactly?
medhir
·9 か月前·議論
would buy this in a heartbeat if I could run macOS… it’s such a shame iPad hardware has been so held back by Apple’s lackluster software strategy for this long
medhir
·9 か月前·議論
Avoiding iOS 26 like the plague for exactly this reason. It feels like Apple decided they need to leverage their GPU silicon for a fancy GUI update without any concern for usability downgrades.
medhir
·11 か月前·議論
True, I wasn’t thinking very deeply when I wrote this comment… local models indeed are prone to the same exploits.

Regardless, giving a remote API access to a browser seems insane. Having had a chance to reflect, I’d be very wary of providing any LLM access to take actions with my personal computer. Sandbox the hell out of these things.
medhir
·11 か月前·議論
Personally, the only way I’m going to give an LLM access to a browser is if I’m running inference locally.

I’m sure there’s exploits that could be embedded into a model that make running locally risky as well, but giving remote access to Anthropic, OpenAI, etc just seems foolish.

Anyone having success with local LLMs and browser use?
medhir
·11 か月前·議論
100% in alignment with this! Direct quote from the end of the post I linked:

“In the broader conversation of right to repair regulations, we also need to be thinking about a "right to root access" for computing devices.” :)
medhir
·11 か月前·議論
This is a great point. Not sure if it’s possible, would be great if there was some way to reclaim the notion of installing software as a general practice, regardless of whether a computer is “mobile” or “desktop”.

Like people still download software packages from the web on Windows, MacOS, and Linux… right? Maybe hard to grasp for the kids that grew up with tablets with no notion of a file system, idk
medhir
·11 か月前·議論
Every day we stray farther from the premise that we should be allowed to install / modify software on the computers we own.

Will once again re-up the concept of a “right to root access”, to prevent big corps from pulling this bs over and over again: https://medhir.com/blog/right-to-root-access
medhir
·昨年·議論
you hit the nail on the head. my experience with prompting LLMs is that providing extra context that isn’t explicitly needed leads to “distracted” outputs
medhir
·昨年·議論
China publicly advertises itself as communist regime. I get that we want to protect our interests from foreign adversaries, I disagree that this is the way to do so.

China banning Facebook is an authoritarian action. If we are doing the “same shit”, it feels expressly undemocratic and I am speaking towards that.
medhir
·昨年·議論
was not really on TikTok but a bleak day for anyone that believes in the free speech ideals the US was founded on