HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

michaelbuck

no profile record

コメント

michaelbuck
·6 か月前·議論
Other comments pointed out the semi-obvious use of AI due to em dashes.

I'm honestly at a point where every suspicious aspect of that post could as well be counted as a countermeasure to getting caught. Said engineer could still be working at the company or could've left years ago. In my opinion the mentioned financial adjustments could've been a discussion topic for higher ups far far earlier than 2025.

Considering how ruthless Uber has acted thorough the years[0] I am almost 100% sure other startups with similar opportunities have at the very least committed crimes on a similar scale to the linked Reddit confession.

Bonus option: The Reddit account starts astroturfing in a few weeks and this was just a run-of-the-mill bot automation to gain karma which happened to overlap with HN interests.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Uber
michaelbuck
·7 か月前·議論
Additional anecdote about Monotype pricing policies:

https://old.reddit.com/r/graphic_design/comments/1jqqlm6/mon...
michaelbuck
·3 年前·議論
That's exactly why this situation feels a little weird. Usually Amazon usually just lets things like this slide.[1]

Amazon initially didn't take the product down from its site after being informed of these results, saying it had documentation supporting its safety, according to the Journal. Later Amazon did remove the product, saying it would ask for more documentation from the company it had used to test it.

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-selling-toxic-toys-le...
michaelbuck
·3 年前·議論
Nine hours after this was posted the link is 404'ing and about 90% of the links in the comments are also showing a 404. Is some Amazon employee spending their friday afternoon manually removing product listings?