HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

miligauss

no profile record

コメント

miligauss
·4 か月前·議論
[dead]
miligauss
·4 か月前·議論
fwiw the agents just drop their whole solutions
miligauss
·4 か月前·議論
The agents also monitor and follow research strategies regardless of performance baseline, so anything used in the knowledge base include local minimums are considered during strategy ideation. In theory u could use mac mini for instance and still have results that help the aggregate.
miligauss
·5 か月前·議論
we tried putnam a2
miligauss
·5 か月前·議論
claude code doesn't support subscriptions out of the box, so we use the subscription feature to just alert the orchestrator to a single polling file. Not the most elegant thing but still a token save over reading a bunch of sub agent logs. It is as reactive as you can be given the current feature set of claude code.
miligauss
·5 か月前·議論
It's a more of a black box with claude, at least with this you see the proof strategy and mistakes made by the model when it decomposes the problem. I think instead of Ralph looping you get something that is top-down. If models were smarter and context windows bigger i am sure complex tasks like this one would be simpler, but braking it down into sub agents and having a collective --"we already tried this strategy and it backtracked"-- intelligence is a nice way to scope a limited context window to an independent sub problem.