HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

mkeeter

6,864 カルマ登録 12 年前
Electrical engineering and DIY CAD/CAM

https://mattkeeter.com

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 mkeeter·22 日前·0 コメント

What Bun Can Tell Us About AI, Open Source and Anthropic

redmonk.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 mkeeter·先月·0 コメント

GitHub Is Having Issues

githubstatus.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 mkeeter·3 か月前·2 コメント

A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it

ericwbailey.website
4 ポイント·投稿者 mkeeter·3 か月前·2 コメント

Taking steps to end abusive traffic from cloud providers

anubis.techaro.lol
2 ポイント·投稿者 mkeeter·8 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

mkeeter
·5 日前·議論
> This is a clean separation, and clean separations are worth noticing. They tend to be load-bearing.

oh hi Claude
mkeeter
·2 か月前·議論
Does one also get dopamine from using LLMs to write comments on Hacker News?
mkeeter
·2 か月前·議論
A repository search shows 2.2K repos with the text "A Mini Shai-Hulud has Appeared", all created within the past day:

https://github.com/search?q=A%20Mini%20Shai-Hulud%20has%20Ap...
mkeeter
·3 か月前·議論
Cryptic Titles Are All You Need
mkeeter
·3 か月前·議論
Fair enough, I accept "the blog post was written by someone from the 1800s" as an alternative hypothesis.

edit: For what it's worth, I also just tested the Gettysburg Address (using the "Bliss Copy" from [1]), and got a "100% Human" score.

[1] https://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/gettys...
mkeeter
·3 か月前·議論
The review is also heavily LLM-inflected, to the point of being distracting.

GPTZero gives it a 100% chance of being AI generated, and I've found that these tools may give false negatives from a well-prompted model, but false positives are rare.

If you are looking to tune your intuition for AI-written text, here's an interesting list of their quirks (ironically provided as a Claude skill for removing those quirks from emitted text):

https://github.com/stephenturner/skill-deslop/blob/main/refe...
mkeeter
·4 か月前·議論
The "Intermediate Report" [1] lists the authors as "Robert V. and Claude (Anthropic)". Is there any reason to believe this is not AI hallucinations?

[1] https://stateofutopia.com/papers/2/intermediate-report.pdf
mkeeter
·4 か月前·議論
Congrats!

(We had one back in December; you’re in for a fun ride!)
mkeeter
·4 か月前·議論
They certainly have ambitions – the most recent changelog claims to add "Full PCB design pipeline: schematic capture, routing, DRC, Gerber export, and signal integrity simulation."

It also seems to have a physics engine, a slicer for 3D printing, an embroidery mode, and a entire ecosystem of math crates (https://tang.toys/).

Whether any of that works – or whether it's pure LLM slop – is less clear. I tried to import a trivial STEP file, and it crashed my browser tab [1]. Every commit is co-authored by Claude.

[1] https://github.com/ecto/vcad/issues/7
mkeeter
·4 か月前·議論
Not a typo, but you’re correct about the sample rate - with those settings, the scope was doing interpolation between samples.
mkeeter
·5 か月前·議論
More evidence: the user posted three well-formatted multi-sentence comments within 15 seconds.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47110801 (13:23:08)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47110803 (13:23:15)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47110804 (13:23:23)
mkeeter
·5 か月前·議論
I have received 168 support ticket emails in the past 30 mins, and Gmail has not yet learned to flag them as spam.

This is an absolute clown show.

Edit: whoops, this was incorrect! I had received over 1,000 Zendesk emails, 168 of which made it into my inbox.
mkeeter
·5 か月前·議論
Which NRTL did you end up using for certifications? Can you say more about that process?
mkeeter
·5 か月前·議論
oh hi ChatGPT

The giveaway is that LLMs love bulleted lists with a bolded attention-grabbing phrase to start each line. Copy-pasting directly to HN has stripped the bold formatting and bullets from the list, so the attention-grabbing phrase is fused into the next sentence, e.g. “Potential for abuse Attestation enables blacklisting”
mkeeter
·6 か月前·議論
https://mattkeeter.com

Lots of projects, ranging from embedded systems to DIY CAD software and GPU algorithms.
mkeeter
·7 か月前·議論
The publisher describes itself as “Fusion of Researcher and AI: Independent publisher of peer-reviewed research in post-biological epistemics“

Is there any reason to believe this isn’t an AI-assisted crank publication?
mkeeter
·9 か月前·議論
> jj undo is great but it's a one time thing.

For what it's worth, this changed in v0.33.0:

> jj undo is now sequential: invoking it multiple times in sequence repeatedly undoes actions in the operation log.

(release notes: https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/releases/tag/v0.33.0)
mkeeter
·10 か月前·議論
(I work at Oxide, though I wasn't around for the initial chip selection process)

It's at least partially a matter of timing: Oxide was picking its initial hardware in roughly 2020, and the RP2040 wasn't released until 2021.

A handful of people have done ports, e.g. https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris/pull/2210, but I expect to stick with STM32s for the foreseeable future – we've got a lot to do, and they're working well enough!