HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

mockingloris

no profile record

投稿

I Just watched "We just launched Paxel" by narrated by Garry Tan [video]

youtube.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 mockingloris·先月·2 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 mockingloris·2 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 mockingloris·9 か月前·0 コメント

Psychological Egoism – TLDR by Mockingloris

iep.utm.edu
3 ポイント·投稿者 mockingloris·10 か月前·1 コメント

Google signed me out of YouTube, Gmail redirects to Google subdomain/Gmail

workspace.google.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 mockingloris·10 か月前·2 コメント

I had the same idea for *...*

4 ポイント·投稿者 mockingloris·10 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

mockingloris
·先月·議論
... we built Paxel to turn the lights on. Paxel reads your clawed codecs and cursor sessions and shows you how you actually build.
mockingloris
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
mockingloris
·3 か月前·議論
Thanks for making this. It's totally refreshingly intuitive while doing the practice puzzle!

Just tried it out on my browser. Will be following this.

Also would love to see your workflow you spoke about, on coming up with puzzle ideas and tile arrangements. Cheers!
mockingloris
·3 か月前·議論
> I had to recover somebody's bookmarks for them recently after it decided to destroy the main copy.

@Chaosvex curious how you did that.
mockingloris
·3 か月前·議論
@cloche... spot on.

If we are all honest, it seems to be the case - most of the time:

- Refactoring (Sometimes starting again.. this is rarely starting from scratch as there would have been some insights and personal design decisions garnered from the previous experience) - Specificity (It is heavily influenced by energy which also is different depending time of day or on the individual level)

At the end of the day, it takes taste + experience of the user to make anything of notable complexity(architecture) with AI.(For now and the nearest future at least).

I find reading articles as this gives me a renewed sense of agency as a technologist and my growing list of passions.

A solid thank you to Lalit Maganti for sharing and the better HN community. I found a lot to steal reuse from the material/banter.
mockingloris
·3 か月前·議論
Beautiful presentation... @willybrauner, I would like to read your spin on a follow-up piece on `glitch-freedom`. But in all honesty, this journal entry/post is a work of art; a testament to your journey as a technologist!.

Cheers
mockingloris
·6 か月前·議論
This is math, beauty, art, creativity, ... unique. My mind is all over the place. Still wrapping my head around it but, I'd really like to see where this leads.
mockingloris
·9 か月前·議論
..and time.
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
TLDR: Psychological Egoism

Think of egoism like a single-threaded algorithm assuming all actions optimize for self. Altruism suggests a multi-threaded model where some processes prioritize others’ well-being. Data from user behavior (empathy-driven actions) and system design (evolutionary efficiency) supports a hybrid model—humans aren’t just “selfish” codebases.

Debated since Hobbes, it’s challenged by:

  - Butler’s Stone: Pleasure is a byproduct, not the goal.
  - Science: Biology (altruism aids survival), neuroscience (motivation ≠ pleasure), and psychology (empathy drives genuine care) suggest mixed motives.
  - Analogy: Egoism is a single-threaded “selfish” algorithm; altruism adds threads for others’ benefit. Data leans toward a hybrid model.
Whenever I dive into a creative project, whether it’s freelancing for a client or tinkering on my own stuff, I know exactly what’s coming. The dopamine hit from shipping code is unreal, like a high from solving a puzzle that’s been nagging me for days. The rep boost, the financial payoff (or potential for my own projects).

But deep down, it’s not just about me. Crafting something that users love or that makes their lives easier? That’s the real magic. It’s a mix of selfish thrill and selfless impact, like a perfectly balanced commit.
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
Level 5: Rotation was very satisfying.
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
@jayspiel

> As A designer I was trying to skate to where the puck was going technically.

Resonates big time! At the end of the day, this isn't a full-proof science - it's an art. Req-con-fin(Requires continuous finessing).

I also assume, the project revolved around many roles and as you mentioned, the project was iteratively built around user feedback.

NLM disrupted the space and I know just like with the early days of bard/gemini this will only get insanely better; UI/UX especially.

Dey Well
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
I use a linux distro as my driver; I'm a linux bro and also phone's still awaiting repairs). I opened my Firefox Developer Edition and tried opening Youtube and found I had been logged out. Tried gmail, same thing - My other gmail accounts too. Gmail redirected me to url[0] to re-authenticate.

Anybody else?

[0] https://workspace.google.com/gmail/
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
> Also, could you consider making each fourth (or first) column a very slightly lighter grey

This could be a component logic; a row of drop downs for customizing the UI and a good examples are color and grid count. This could even be a toml/json config file that can be imported/exported.

My own addition is ability to import samples from my own device.
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
Wondered the same thing. That's a lot of data for just one file!

Did a full-day deep dive into SQLite a while back; funny how one tiny database runs the whole world—phones, AI, your fridge, your face... and like, five people keep it alive.

Blows my mind.
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
> From the official SQLite Database File Format page.

The maximum size database would be 4294967294 pages at 65536 bytes per page or 281,474,976,579,584 bytes (about 281 terabytes).

Usually SQLite will hit the maximum file size limit of the underlying filesystem or disk hardware long before it hits its own internal size limit.
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
Kudos to you and the journey. I appreciate your honesty honestly about giving up on open source alternative for a quite cheap alternative for something you get to keep as your own is not a bad tradeoff.

Your story resonates. I am a self-taught creative and I get stubborn at times about wanting to use/bend a specific technology/tool to achieve a task; maybe it's a sunk cost fallacy OCD thing.

Your site design has character.

PS: Bookmarked your site with the tags - fonts, developer-blog, creative-sites, boutique-designs... on my firefox browser.
mockingloris
·10 か月前·議論
> They say that you remember more when handwriting than when typing

I believe that too.

Writing is one of my tools for taming my ADHD tendencies. I have journals of different sizes and when I am in the zone, I capture the moment in my own words and in my own way. I draw lines and art on my notes and just scanning a few lines on another day instantly immerses me back in the moment when the ideas/words/thought hit me.

For those who type better than they write, I don't see any reason to not do that, even though for me, it's pen on paper.

We're all different and I am a strong believer of the idiom that goes "One man's food..."