HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

mpmisko

no profile record

投稿

World Models for Planning Agents

mpmisko.github.io
2 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: MediSearch Pro–most accurate medical question-answering system

medisearch.io
1 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·0 コメント

Show HN: Verify medical claims in TikToks and YouTube Shorts

medisearch.io
1 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·1 コメント

Fun times with energy-based models

mpmisko.github.io
82 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·14 コメント

AI Fundamentals: Energy-Based Models

mpmisko.github.io
2 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·0 コメント

Solving Death with AI? A Deep Dive into Energy-Based Models

mpmisko.github.io
1 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·0 コメント

AI Fundamentals: Energy-Based Models

mpmisko.github.io
5 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·0 コメント

What happened to blogs

mpmisko.github.io
70 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·61 コメント

[untitled]

2 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·0 コメント

Show HN: I put PubMed in a vector DB

pubmedisearch.com
97 ポイント·投稿者 mpmisko·2 年前·27 コメント

コメント

mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
EBMs show up all over the place, apparently even your classifier is an EBM :) (https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03263).
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
GPT-based search engines usually use some sort of a database to retrieve context for the LLM to summarize first. This is what people refer to as RAG these days: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/what-is-retrieval-augmented-ge....

Some of these GPT engines maintain their own vector DB to do semantic search, others are directly hooked into Bing / Google. So pubmedisearch.com would be one component of a GPT-based engine. We actually have a GPT-based engine here: https://medisearch.io/.
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Will definitely check pgvector, thanks for the pointer.
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Lots of annoying edge cases as you can imagine, nothing particularly glamorous.
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Done! Let me know if you have other feedback.
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Thanks! Looks quite relevant
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Training for multiple epochs is a bit like that :)
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
We use pinecone and it is not ideal, looking at https://turbopuffer.com/ now. They look quite promising :)
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
1. We cover all the articles on PMC. The exact cost is hard to estimate because we did a lot of iterations.

2. We do weight those ... it is a lot of trial and error and you have to have good & exhaustive benchmarks.
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Yes
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Glad you like it! I did this as a mini-project within our startup MediSearch (https://medisearch.io/) & the search pipeline is custom tuned for the problem.
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Hi, it currently does not support search by PMID. But you can find the paper included in the results here (5th place):

https://pubmedisearch.com/share/Do%20some%20individuals%20wi...
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Just looking at stuff like citations and impact factors of journals.
mpmisko
·2 年前·議論
Thanks!

It uses a vector search approach. Your query is embedded in a vector space using a language model and we find the closest vector to the query from the PubMed papers. This is a good summary of the techniques: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/vector-search.... There are a couple more tricks but this is the gist.

The nice part is that this approach allows you to find relevant papers to your question. E.g, you can ask "Can secondhand smoke cause AMD?" and the very first few papers are answering your question (https://pubmedisearch.com/share/Can%20secondhand%20smoke%20c...). The more specific question, the better. :)