HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

mrwrong

no profile record

コメント

mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
and the corollary is of course that saying something doesn't make it true
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
[flagged]
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
[flagged]
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
[flagged]
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
I'm not sure many people will believe you saying that
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
> "Sovereign head of state" tortured, "disappeared", and murdered thousands, and rigged elections.

can't wait for someone to kidnap trump as well
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
because that's not their job?
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
everybody is emotionally motivated, you included
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
nobody's trying to force you to socialize, it's just advice. take it or leave it
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
sure but my point is people could agree they were faster at least. that is decidedly not true for LLMs. maybe due to alignable vs non-alignable differences
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
sounds like snake oil to me :)
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
I wonder why the volume of spam has come up 100x. seems like maybe Ads are the only way to make Sense of it
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
and those stories were in the short run correct, since Amazon and Uber succeeded by massively undercutting existing businesses. reel customers in with charity, then turn the screws. what business is ChatGPT undercutting?
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
yes, it is trivially true that each new person who recommends LLMs is a new person coming into the fold
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
who would I be trying to trick if it was? you didn't answer the question anyways. I'm not wondering whether cars were seen as strictly better than horses in all situations. I'm wondering if people disagreed so vehemently about whether cars were faster road transportation than horses
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
yeah I agree about the negative externalities but I'm curious about the perceived benefits. did anybody argue that cars were actually slower than horse and carriage? (were they at first?)
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
[dead]
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
[dead]
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
have you tried using $NEWEST_MODEL ?
mrwrong
·6 か月前·議論
get ready to tick those numbers over to 2026!