HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

nalllar

no profile record

投稿

ROCm 7.1.1: you can (not) build

lunnova.dev
2 ポイント·投稿者 nalllar·5 か月前·0 コメント

AI generated posts about AI failures (keep showing up on HN)

lunnova.dev
3 ポイント·投稿者 nalllar·5 か月前·1 コメント

コメント

nalllar
·3 か月前·議論
Yeah this is optimizing for the good case instead of tail risks and mistakes and we see too many overdoses already.

Of course, we could press the fix this immediately button by requiring acetaminophen to be sold mixed with NAC but that would be too easy.
nalllar
·5 か月前·議論
For context before playing the video, this talk from FOSDEM 2026 is about patching security issues under active exploitation in the continuwuity matrix homeserver implementation and was published by Jade who is one of continuwuity's maintainers.

Slides: https://fosdem.org/2026/events/attachments/ETMLM8-signed_sea...
nalllar
·5 か月前·議論
It almost certainly is AI generated. It reads like it is, pangram thinks it is, https://www.pangram.com/history/02bead1c-c36e-461b-8fa7-8699... and pangram's unlikely to give false positives https://www.pangram.com/blog/third-party-pangram-evals
nalllar
·5 か月前·議論
I keep running into posts about AI written by AI via friends who found them on HN. HN commenters seem unaware.

Semantic ablation: Why AI writing is generic and boring https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47049088

The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46962996

The singularity will occur on a tuesday received thousands of votes. It wasn't bad but I'd have preferred less AI fluff around the fun modelling.

Why's this so prevalent here?
nalllar
·5 か月前·議論
The article itself reads as an AI generated output, complete with classic Not Just X … Y hallmarks from forever ago, 100% on pangram's low false positive detector. I'm not sure if it's some experiment on their readerbase or what. pangram result: https://www.pangram.com/history/02bead1c-c36e-461b-8fa7-8699...

So many AI generated AI bashing articles lately. I wrote a post complaining about running into these, and asking people who've sent me these AI articles multiple of them came from HN. https://lunnova.dev/articles/ai-bashing-ai-slop/
nalllar
·7 か月前·議論
Somewhat.
nalllar
·8 か月前·議論
Spending >10 minutes doing template instantiation for a single kernel for a single ISA is impressive!

`device_grouped_conv2d_fwd_xdl_ngchw_gkcyx_ngkhw_f16_instance`, what are you doing to our poor friend clang?
nalllar
·8 か月前·議論
qqxufo's recent posts read like a large langle mangle to me
nalllar
·10 か月前·議論
> 1. NEVER EVER login from an email link. EVER. There are enough legit and phishing emails asking you to do this that it's basically impossible to tell one from the other. The only way to win is to not try.

Sites choosing to replace password login with initiating the login process and then clicking a "magic link" in your email client is awful for developing good habits here, or for giving good general advice. :c