HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

natebc

714 カルマ登録 5 年前

投稿

Whimsy and the Literacy Crisis [video]

youtube.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 natebc·5 日前·1 コメント

FMS – A Groovebox for the Nintendo Game Boy Advance

lo-bit.club
2 ポイント·投稿者 natebc·2 か月前·1 コメント

Mike's Weather Page

spaghettimodels.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 natebc·4 か月前·0 コメント

Notepad++ supply chain attack breakdown

securelist.com
384 ポイント·投稿者 natebc·5 か月前·192 コメント

OpenTTD 15.0

openttd.org
45 ポイント·投稿者 natebc·6 か月前·1 コメント

From Silicon to Sandstorm: breaking famous synthesizer DSPs [video]

media.ccc.de
3 ポイント·投稿者 natebc·6 か月前·1 コメント

A primer for using weather surveillance radar to study bird migration

birdcast.info
34 ポイント·投稿者 natebc·9 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

natebc
·6 時間前·議論
I estimated about 6 quid. We left £3300 behind because 3300 1-lb bags of sugar only costs £1800.

;) I like these easy breezy Late Friday threads!
natebc
·8 時間前·議論
Well that's what ... 300 or so pints?
natebc
·9 時間前·議論
Megagrams?? I like it.
natebc
·9 時間前·議論
well that's just £3300 then, yeah?
natebc
·19 時間前·議論
Only the rightists do and among them really only the loud redfaced ones.
natebc
·昨日·議論
Didn't Steve Bannon do a tour in Europe recently to dispense some of his strategy?

This smells like him, honestly.
natebc
·一昨日·議論
Oh i've worked with plenty. Maybe they knew more than they let on but they were (and are) convinced that every little belch is a full on attack.

I know their day to day is just as mundane as the rest of ours it's their "Step 1" approach that i've seen to be entirely different. I assume it's probably a software bug, they assume it's an exploit.
natebc
·3 日前·議論
It's because you (like me) aren't quite as paranoid as security people are. Personally I couldn't sleep at night if I was security people.

It's really a matter of context. Security people tend to only be involved when things are already nefarious where as boring old normal people like us see get to see the mundane everyday mistakes so not just the nefarious bits.
natebc
·3 日前·議論
It claims to be backed by (and require) apple/containers(1) which "consumes and produces OCI-compatible container images" so if all that is true .... yes!

1) https://github.com/apple/container
natebc
·4 日前·議論
Really it's the only way to win at gambling.
natebc
·5 日前·議論
"... moving truth from the realm of objectivity to the realm of subjectivity."

Admittedly this is not typical HN faire but Ash talks about the impact of "the algorithm" and impact on the parlance of truth.

Plus she's very entertaining.
natebc
·5 日前·議論
close, but not quite. I suppose in the way that originally set him off, yes.

It looks like they're using the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license so restricting commercial use which I think would run afoul of the purists definition of Freedom?

It's a cool printer, and I'd much rather have something like this!
natebc
·6 日前·議論
Where I live (Durham, NC) Google Fi's MNO is T-Mobile so they're effectively the same.
natebc
·8 日前·議論
i knew it was a little while after WWII (college history was long, long ago!) but didn't realize it was ... 1975-1977!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_transition_to_democrac...
natebc
·9 日前·議論
This is the bit in the copyright offices' report that i'm trying to square:

>The Office concludes that, given current generally available technology, prompts alone do not provide sufficient human control to make users of an AI system the authors of the output.

https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intell...
natebc
·9 日前·議論
> Your AI slop is effectively public domain.

I haven't been able to square this belief (This is what i believe too.) with what I perceive as so, so many people making projects, putting them on github and slapping an MIT/GPL license on them.

If IP rights can't be applied to generated code then how are they able to apply a such a license to them?

I've asked this before and the response was along the lines of people thinking their multiple prompting amounted to human creative process and therefore it was covered but ... how? Any lawyers around that can ELI5 it for us? Maybe links to a lawyer somewhere who did?
natebc
·10 日前·議論
it's not your bike that he stole.
natebc
·12 日前·議論
I'm pretty sure the Optimization part is just ... not present at all.

This is how we get LLM summaries presenting something mentioned once by some nutjob in a reddit thread as bona fide FACT
natebc
·12 日前·議論
The Uber guy? Yeah that was a painful watch.
natebc
·22 日前·議論
Who knows. I'm sure it was pretty expensive. Was certainly more comfortable on that side of their legal desk though I'm sure.