HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

nephronaut

no profile record

投稿

Dissecting innovation thresholds with Vinton Cerf

dl.acm.org
16 ポイント·投稿者 nephronaut·2 年前·0 コメント

コメント

nephronaut
·2 年前·議論
Wait this header doesn’t make sense. Laid off for the first time? Twice?
nephronaut
·2 年前·議論
There are more interesting investigations and results This one is ok but not remarkable
nephronaut
·2 年前·議論
So how to feed in the instance if code is only

Nebulous1:

Here is the line, it is written in K. K is a language created by the same person (Arthur Whitney) based on APL and Scheme. x(,/{@[x;y;]'(!10)^x|/p[;y]=p,:,3/:-3!p:!9 9}')/&~x
nephronaut
·2 年前·議論
This is surely the strongest point voiced. Most if not all subsequent chains pre-mined a substantial fraction then used proceeds to fundraise some cash and held the rest in reservoir Until they could keep dumping once listed. So any subsequent chain never adhered to the original principles of satoshi. And I have seen some funky shit with CEO’s that have legitimate seeming background but completely abused this. But here is the snag. Most early Pre-listing investors will love it coz they have gotten a golden parachute investment, and will defend the CEO at all cost.
nephronaut
·2 年前·議論
What an intriguing viewpoint! Never crossed my mind
nephronaut
·2 年前·議論
[dead]