HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ninacomputer

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 ninacomputer·2 年前·0 コメント

A guide to the types of AI to know in 2024

medium.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 ninacomputer·2 年前·0 コメント

[untitled]

11 ポイント·投稿者 ninacomputer·2 年前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 ninacomputer·3 年前·0 コメント

US Technological Dominance Is Not What It Used to Be

wired.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 ninacomputer·3 年前·1 コメント

Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

thequantuminsider.com
430 ポイント·投稿者 ninacomputer·3 年前·267 コメント

コメント

ninacomputer
·昨年·議論
Zero examples of portfolios on the site. Looks like an AI-generated site with default Bolt or v0 styles. No idea why anyone would use this and not just any of the million other options.

But you're expecting all that feedback surely. So what's the rebuttal? Why would anyone want to use this when they can just use v0 to spin up a site in seconds, or Jekyll or Ghost or list goes on?
ninacomputer
·2 年前·議論
Was going to ask a similar question. Where in the experience of Cursor do you feel like you're losing some of the agency of solving the harder problems, or is this something you take in mind while using it?
ninacomputer
·2 年前·議論
Just in passing, Quanta magazine has been excellent lately!
ninacomputer
·2 年前·議論
nah we use asciidoc for this. worked next to the guy who invented it back in the day. another team at our company used to to make topic-based authoring the CMS standard. been doing this fine for years now and even the writers seem happy (super rare for tech writers innit)
ninacomputer
·2 年前·議論
but why would a "Documentation" cms care about showcasing personal sites?
ninacomputer
·2 年前·議論
What does this do that all the other Hugo docs templates don't do?

The "Showcase" section just shows a bunch of non-docs stuff. Why would I use this instead of readthedocs, gitbook, docasaurus, or any of the million others?

Also... generic markdown?
ninacomputer
·2 年前·議論
Whoa. This was way more impressive than I expected! And now I'm learning about Kirigami (and hoping my ancestors forgive me for not knowing this already).
ninacomputer
·3 年前·議論
The scary thing is how many IBM "experts" from the quantum computing teams fled to quantum startups. I interviewed with some after interning at a FAANG, and as a female in tech with family members who have run tech companies, I like to think my BS radar is pretty good.

It went off constantly with a certain "type" of "startup executive", and I noticed they were all former IBM or Intel. I'm not a negative person but found them all to be visibly political, all sounded like that didn't actually do anything really real, and talked a big game that the company outputs didn't seem to match.

I guess they are costing the quantum startups (aka VCs) a lot of money for very little actual work. This is just my observation and just my experience but I'm keeping tabs because it will be interesting to see how many quantum startups fail over the next few years, and which were run by IBM execs. I have my hypotheses ready.
ninacomputer
·3 年前·議論
This is the kind of insightful music history article I wish we got more of. Wonderful. Thank you for sharing.
ninacomputer
·3 年前·議論
This is too real and relatable. We take clean air so for granted huh.
ninacomputer
·3 年前·議論
Picked up a filter purifier here and it's in good use now with the fires. Wish I could get the more fancier and more functional options, but they are so expensive with demand.