HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

nprateem

2,605 カルマ登録 8 年前

投稿

Will software engineers survive agentic AI?

ft.com
6 ポイント·投稿者 nprateem·4 か月前·1 コメント

Meth: We're on It

ft.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 nprateem·6 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

nprateem
·一昨日·議論
Watching YouTube recently and lots of videos are clearly entirely scripted by AI, shit analogies and all. You can almost hear the emdashes.

It really is painful watching.
nprateem
·一昨日·議論
Over the last few days with fable I've found it at times incomprehensible, terse word salad. It also invents phrases assuming I'll understand (but that could be because it's reusing terms in the codebase I no longer remember).

I've often had to paste its output back in to ask it what it actually means. Weird.

I think the main thing is just fatigue. There's so little variety. Each model has its preferred idiolect which everyone becomes tired of due to ubiquity. That's the worst part. It's like always eating fast food.
nprateem
·5 日前·議論
It still does stupid stuff like leave unnecessary abstractions around after refactoring instead of proactively suggesting to remove them.
nprateem
·5 日前·議論
There's just no escaping from making decisions. Agents can't reliably make them as many rely on tacit knowledge which isn't written down.

This bottleneck will always have to exist unless companies just accept AI defaults, with predictable outcomes.
nprateem
·5 日前·議論
Case law
nprateem
·18 日前·議論
Jesus. Finally. I told you so.
nprateem
·24 日前·議論
If I see AI content online I bounce because I can ask AI myself. All the AI slop has zero benefit to companies doing it to me if they want to target me. But then some people watch tiktoks, so as usual we're in an echo chamber.
nprateem
·先月·議論
> The model definitely remembers previous exchanges within the same conversation.

Christ HN isn't what it used to be
nprateem
·先月·議論
> if they don't understand how computers work

Or if they're retards. The fact this still comes up is weird. A printing press isn't conscious, so why would an LLM be.

Don't forget, some of the bros are overly excitable. Like that twat who reckoned a Google model 5 years ago was conscious.
nprateem
·先月·議論
> I'm not fully convinced that consciousness isn't built out of words

I know you're trolling, but when you watch a movie do you constantly narrate "A man in a dark coat has just entered the scene and just said '...'"? Of course not. You just watch it and you're obviously conscious (although your statement demonstrates shocking lack of self-awareness).

God knows what other nonsensical bullshit you believe.
nprateem
·先月·議論
Or people trying to pump it like they're Musk (pump it like you're Musk) pre-IPO
nprateem
·先月·議論
Obvs the first thing is that everyone interprets the word "God" differently. But for myself I'd say I believe that there is

1. a universal consciousness,

2. an energy that works through everything, and

3. that we can tap into both.

Been a slow journey from atheism to this, but mainly based on reading countless first-hand descriptions of enlightenment, mostly related to Kundalini experiences and psychedelic-induced. Reported experiences often fall into such similar categories, sometimes with the same symbology it's either something weirdly evolved in us (for no evolutionary advantage I can see), or some people gain access to deeper levels of reality.

Personal experiences for me that tipped it were:

1. My own Kundalini experiences (not the full-blown transcendental kind yet, but energy surges, meditation phenomena)

2. Receiving remote shaktipat, where energy was projected into me. One of the most surprising was when I was just lying down and a woman 10 miles away sent energy to me for half an hour. It was unmistakable, and wasn't possible she had subconsciously influenced me as she barely spoke to me until after the practice apart from telling me to lie down and relax.

Also, I recently worked out how to 'drop my mind' like Zen practioners talk about. Realised that's the core of concentration-style meditation. Good feelings start to arise on their own.

It's a personal journey (and ultimately the only one that counts), and the mind gets in the way, but each to their own.
nprateem
·先月·議論
I wish someone would do this for a modern TTD but with railroad tycoon stock market/economy dynamics
nprateem
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
nprateem
·2 か月前·議論
Probably because we've been told AI is close to AGI and will TAKE OVER THE WORLD.
nprateem
·2 か月前·議論
Building blocks by https://audiblegenius.com/ is excellent, as is DMP (see my other comment).
nprateem
·2 か月前·議論
Syntorial is good for learning synth programming.

Lots of video courses fail to actually teach you the fundamentals. I wasn't super impressed with sonic academy for this reason. It was basically "watch me do stuff". Groove3 was ok but tbh most dance production teachers on there seemed meh.

The absolute king is dancemusicproduction.com [1]. The guy who teaches has literally written the manual on dance music production (Snoman). He says he's been a ghost producer for Guetta and worked on Kylie Minogue, etc.

By all accounts if you want to learn from an actual pro who can actually teach all the fundamentals, it's this guy. Was so pleased when I finally found it.

[1] https://www.dancemusicproduction.com/oldpg/
nprateem
·2 か月前·議論
Yeah it's corporate subprime. Bundle a load of overpriced "assets" with made up valuations into something that's actually valuable, then shove it on the public markets so everyone has to buy it in their index trackers.
nprateem
·2 か月前·議論
Well the point is you tell it what to do isn't it? Unless your job is so replaceable and generic there's little actual direction needed?

I still can barely have a convo with it where it doesn't just make up total unworkable bollocks.

It can manage some coding though tbf, but again, not sure how far a completely non-tech user would find it.
nprateem
·3 か月前·議論
OMG, some of those are legit good. That said the AI seems minimally guidable. It seems to ignore three majority of instructions in https://suno.com/song/25b16ab7-bfea-451d-abb3-8b52cdd783d0?s... so I guess like most tools, it's fine if you want to get what you're given but not really control it.