No, because the rising tide of automation should, at least ostensibly, lift all boats. If the extra utility created by automation is captured by technocrats, that’s a political and social problem, not a technical one. Pointing out the ways that technology can be abused isn’t an argument against technology - it’s an argument against abuse, and for governance that optimizes the wellbeing of constituents.
I hope I’m not misunderstanding you, but I could be. Are you saying that because the LLM was able to impress you that it must be thinking? (Whatever that means)