HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

nyc111

1,230 カルマ登録 13 年前
https://1notes1.online/index.html

投稿

Physics doesn't explain the universe. Computation does – Stephen Wolfram

youtube.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·5 日前·0 コメント

AI and Mathematics Research – Yikes (N.J. Wildberger)

youtube.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·14 日前·0 コメント

'Earthset' Is Captured on Video for First Time

nytimes.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·3 か月前·1 コメント

Perfect Squares and Pythagorean Triples on the Ulam Spiral

youtube.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·5 か月前·0 コメント

Terence Tao: Why I Co-Founded SAIR

youtube.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·5 か月前·0 コメント

AI and Education: Generative AI and the Future of Critical Thinking

youtube.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·5 か月前·0 コメント

The Simplest Math Problem No One Can Solve – Collatz Conjecture

youtube.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·6 か月前·0 コメント

Parabolas and Archimedes - Numberphile

youtube.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·7 か月前·0 コメント

The IBM 1401 compiles and runs Fortran II (2018)

youtube.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·9 か月前·1 コメント

The Genes That Let Our Ancestors Walk Upright

nytimes.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·11 か月前·0 コメント

Real numbers as Cauchy sequences don't work (2015)

youtube.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 nyc111·11 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

nyc111
·3 か月前·議論
I read all the comments in the times post and no one mentions that this is due to the motion of the Artemis II. On the moon there is no "earthrise" or "earthset", only a yearly wobble. On the earth the moon rises and sets because of the earth's rotation. I guess the editors of the NYT knew this so that they put the "earthset" in quotes.
nyc111
·8 か月前·議論
I was able to open it in archive
nyc111
·8 か月前·議論
I use nano a lot but this page is not opening for me. Is someone else having the same problem?
nyc111
·10 か月前·議論
A beautiful book by Michel Pastoureau, Blue: The History of a Color (2001), the same content as the article in book form.

https://www.amazon.com/Blue-History-Color-Michel-Pastoureau/...
nyc111
·11 か月前·議論
More detailed video of Plimpton 322 from the authors of the paper https://youtu.be/L24GzTaOll0?si=sNdwKiM7uYXbzVfL
nyc111
·11 か月前·議論
I tried but his pages do not have links to a home page or other posts
nyc111
·11 か月前·議論
It looks like they chose to use the "universal gravitational constant" "k" instead of Newton^s constant, "G": p.23, "k^2 = universal gravitational constant, 1.32452139x10^20, m^3/(sec^2)(sun mass units)"

I think "k" was also known as "Gaussian gravitational constant" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_gravitational_constan...

But the value and unit of "k" given in the Wikipedia page is different. Do you know what NASA document means by "universal gravitational constant" in modern sense?
nyc111
·11 か月前·議論
Mathematician Norman Wildberger has been criticizing the embrace of infinitiy by modern mathematicians for decades: https://www.youtube.com/@njwildberger/search?query=infinity