HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

onedognight

no profile record

投稿

Judge Issues Tentative Ruling in Favor of SFC

sfconservancy.org
8 ポイント·投稿者 onedognight·7 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

onedognight
·先月·議論
They don’t support any recent rsync protocol, so there’s no 64bit timestamp support, so you can never actually sync metadata across newer filesystems.
onedognight
·2 か月前·議論
I’d guess because most don’t correctly account for wear and tear and depreciation of their car when they do their mental profit calculation.
onedognight
·2 か月前·議論
Unrelated squares in squares, I think the interjection is PSYCH.
onedognight
·2 か月前·議論
Choosing not to look at something is not denying anyone anything.
onedognight
·2 か月前·議論
Support for Trump, or even Republicans writ large, means support for reducing taxes (both estate and income) on the wealthy, while increasing them on consumers (via tariffs). Musk has been an ardent supporter of Trump.
onedognight
·2 か月前·議論
To hell with writing a test for you. That’s what you say to someone who gets paid by you. If the project doesn’t want the fix. That’s their issue, not the reporter’s.
onedognight
·4 か月前·議論
Having the equivalent jq expression in these examples might help to compare expressiveness, and it might help me see if jq could “just” use a DFA when a (sub)query admits one. grep, ripgrep, etc change algorithms based on the query and that makes the speed improvements automatic.
onedognight
·4 か月前·議論
If I have X dollars and get taxed such that I have X * T after the taxing, say T = (1 - .20), then I invest and that money grows by a factor, say G = (1 + .50), over the years, then in the mean time inflation hits and reduces my money by a factor, say I = (1 - .10), so that what I end up with in the end is F = X * G * T * I. If instead I invested and grew and inflated and then got taxed, X * G * I * T, it would be exactly the same. Multiplication is commutative.

What you are doing by delaying taxes is hoping you have a lower rate later. Say you make less in retirement or die untaxed and your kids get a step up in basis. But without a change in rate (which might go up even), there’s no difference.
onedognight
·4 か月前·議論
> Nothing this administration ever does is planned.

You are joking, right? Project 2025 has achieved 50% of its goals in record time[0]. Trump disavowed both it and invading Iran, but make no mistake. Both were “the plan”.

[0] https://www.project2025.observer/en
onedognight
·5 か月前·議論
Prop 13 isn’t the reason old people hang on to their property. You can downgrade and maintain your Prop 13 tax advantage.
onedognight
·5 か月前·議論
> C99 designated initializers are not supported in C++.

They are, finally, part of C++20.
onedognight
·6 か月前·議論
I fully agree. Claude’s review comments have been 50% useful, which is great. For comparison I have almost never found a useful TeamScale comment (classic static analyzer). Even more important, half of Claude’s good finds are orthogonal to those found by other human reviewers on our team. I.e. it points out things human reviewers miss consistently and v.v.
onedognight
·6 か月前·議論
It’s loses them in the current context (say 200k tokens), not in its SQLite history db (limited by your local storage).
onedognight
·6 か月前·議論
For this model to be convincing, you would need to explain the motivation for the pension funds loaning the 90% that then goes to zero. They are repeat investors after all. As are the PE firms.

Are they getting kickbacks? That would be straight up illegal, but it would make the most sense.
onedognight
·6 か月前·議論
The machine (AirSense 11) has been a god send for me. I can’t believe I waited so long. I haven’t slept a night without it since my first. I haven’t had to tweak any settings. It’s just worked. Sure it’s annoying to travel with, and you look odd while wearing it, but deep sleep is so worth it.
onedognight
·7 か月前·議論
The name of the project is a reference to P. G. Wodehouse[0] for those unaware.

[0] https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/author/783
onedognight
·7 か月前·議論
It’s a bit clickbait-y, but the article is short, to the point, and frankly satisfying. If there is such a thing as good clickbait, then this might be it. Impressive work!
onedognight
·7 か月前·議論
This is a great result[0]:

> we found that there are 17 semantic rules in the core semantics which are not covered by the [ECMAScript Conformance Test Suite]

> we succeeded to manually write test programs that hit 11 out of 17 behaviors

> the remaining 6 semantic behaviors are infeasible, that is, they represent flaws in the language standard itself

[0] https://github.com/kframework/javascript-semantics/blob/mast...
onedognight
·8 か月前·議論
Remember when Russia agreed[0] to defend Ukraine if they gave up their nuclear weapons?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
onedognight
·8 か月前·議論
Username checks out.