HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

pancomplex

376 カルマ登録 11 年前
CTO @ Frigade (YC W23)

投稿

Show HN: Reverse-engineering web apps into agent tools

81 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·一昨日·32 コメント

A Good Animation Disappears

frigade.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·11 日前·0 コメント

Startups Are Ruining Reddit

frigade.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·先月·1 コメント

Marketing sites don't need a CMS anymore

frigade.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·2 か月前·0 コメント

Why metaphors make AI animations come out better

frigade.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·2 か月前·0 コメント

I took a physics class as a software engineer

frigade.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·2 か月前·0 コメント

We left Framer (and others will, too)

frigade.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·2 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Two easing curves and no animation library

frigade.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·2 か月前·0 コメント

Why most product tours get skipped

productonboarding.com
208 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·2 か月前·176 コメント

When an AI agent should refuse to answer

frigade.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·2 か月前·0 コメント

Best AI Product Adoption Software in 2026

medium.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 pancomplex·3 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

pancomplex
·10 時間前·議論
This works for non-authenticated sites but wouldn't work for anything behind a login wall that requires a JWT or similar - right?
pancomplex
·10 時間前·議論
Yup just another user account. It can work without this as well (we support ingesting other resources such as help center articles, pdfs, etc.) but at that point it's no different from any other (dumb) AI chatbot out there that just spits out a bunch of itemized bullets.
pancomplex
·11 時間前·議論
Even with an API spec it wouldn't "just work". You'd still need to handle authentication and have a place to manage which APIs you want the in-app agent to have access to / when to call a given tool.

And believe it or not, even big companies with big eng teams don't have API specs available for their applications ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
pancomplex
·12 時間前·議論
We can either replace an intercom widget entirely or do a hand off with context to a live intercom chat agent.
pancomplex
·14 時間前·議論
Here's a more thorough explanation of how it works under the hood: https://frigade.com/features/skills
pancomplex
·14 時間前·議論
Agreed - and especially when the API changes..
pancomplex
·14 時間前·議論
We use a browser-based agent to learn all the APIs and turn them into skills. Most users will run this in a staging/test account to create all the recipes/blueprints. Our agent is also instructed to not take any destructive actions - but of course LLMs make mistakes (hence the test account :) ).

You can see more about how it works in detail here: https://frigade.com/how-it-works
pancomplex
·16 時間前·議論
Works with any frontier LLM model
pancomplex
·16 時間前·議論
No definitely not!

Our customers run the training on their own applications using a demo or staging environment. Then they install the in-app agent you see in the demos and turn on the tool calls they like. All the API calls are executed client side and never touches any of our servers.
pancomplex
·昨日·議論
Not at this point - but we’re considering it! What would you use it for?
pancomplex
·一昨日·議論
Thank you! Along those lines, we did Airbnb too: https://demo.frigade.com/
pancomplex
·一昨日·議論
thank you!
pancomplex
·2 か月前·議論
100% - that's why it's so confusing why PMs/PMMs think they need to keep adding these to their products.
pancomplex
·2 か月前·議論
tbh adblockers should just filter these out. I guess the reason they don't is it's "technically" the product ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
pancomplex
·2 か月前·議論
couldn't agree more - they always pop up at the right time. I don't know why every PM thinks they can save retention by spamming users :(
pancomplex
·6 か月前·議論
seems non of these are typescript-based? Strand appears to have a typescript sdk available but not natively ts.
pancomplex
·6 か月前·議論
We use typescript for all our entire stack and it's super dope to see a production-grade framework (with no vendor lock in) launch!