HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

peterdsharpe

204 カルマ登録 4 年前

コメント

peterdsharpe
·7 時間前·議論
Why use this over Equinox's Module, plus jaxtyping? That seems like the cleaner (and more established) solution, but maybe there are pros/cons I'm not seeing.
peterdsharpe
·30 日前·議論
Death of the AI race? This is the starting gun.
peterdsharpe
·2 か月前·議論
"Financially, what will take me to $1B?" -Greg Brockman, August 2017
peterdsharpe
·2 か月前·議論
Seriously going to use AI to write a reply that would take you 30 seconds?
peterdsharpe
·5 か月前·議論
Thank you for the kind words! :)
peterdsharpe
·9 か月前·議論
This is a desperation move from the LLM providers here. Just think: if you were Sam Altman, and you actually had strong evidence that practical AGI was as imminent as claimed - would you be spending your time building AI-slop TikTok and a smut bot?
peterdsharpe
·9 か月前·議論
[flagged]
peterdsharpe
·9 か月前·議論
There is a beautiful irony in your misspelling of Anno Domini as Anno Domani, for the Italian speakers in the room.
peterdsharpe
·9 か月前·議論
What is the benefit of this over `watch nvidia-smi`, possibly prepended with an `ssh` in the case of a remove server?
peterdsharpe
·10 か月前·議論
I love the concept of this and hope Slate survives, but $27.5k is too expensive for what they're offering. With the Kia Soul at $21.5k and with more features, and the Honda Civic at the same cost, the value proposition isn't there for many people.

Minimialism is great, so long as the price also reflects that.
peterdsharpe
·11 か月前·議論
Yes, it is completely wrong. If this were a valid explanation, flat-plate airfoils could not generate lift. (They can.)

Source: PhD on aircraft design