It's so weird to me that people won't pay taxes for the government research, but then complain when the drugs are out of their price range because the corporation needs extensive profits to make up their costs so the consumer likely end up paying more than they'd pay in taxes for the research and public benefit.
>This act gives tax incentives, subsidies, lowers clinical trial requirements and increases exclusivity for the development of "orphan drugs", which otherwise might not be economically viable to develop. That said, if a condition is rare enough, there's probably no amount of tax incentives that's going to induce a for-profit company to go through the significant costs and hassle of bringing a drug to market
Some people like to claim that the free market works though.
I find listed measurements on AliExpress to be accurate and true to size. I rarely have issues buying clothing from China after measuring my body and writing everything down. I buy a lot of cheap 'beater' pairs of daily use flats from China because I can't justify spending $60-$100 for that little of a shoe, and they fit better than most of the things I have sold by Nine West or CK.
I had brand new HUD permanent housing last year and as long as I qualified the first time, I could've went into a software engineer job making $140k + comp and still living there indefinitely.
Seems pretty reasonable. Not really a band-aid and encourages people to further improve themselves since there's no worry of making too much to continue to live there.
I moved out because my friend offered one of his condos for much less, indefinitely, with no pet fees for my cat, and a yard. Essentially the same thing, just no rules other than don't destroy it :)
This is not "psychological research", the research has already been done to get the human to fall for it. The dark patterns are designed to sell advertisement and product.
Framing it as simply "psychological research" is what I'd expect from a PR team trying to deceive its users. It's incredibly dishonest.
This is not "psychological research", the research has already been done to get the human to fall for it. The dark patterns are designed to sell advertisement and product.
Framing it as simply "psychological research" is what I'd expect from a PR team trying to deceive its users.
Wage slavery and closed source code while companies invest in surveillance technology to work with an over-reaching government while also buying out US government to form an oligarchy is what isn't ethical about closed source products from large corporatioms.
>I am surprised they keep at it despite the bad PR it has already caused.
Americans do not care about privacy or security in any mass sense. They will let the country fall to a total surveillance state with without even batting an eye, put wiretaps right in their homes so they can set timers for their lasanga, all for 'convenience'. Amazon's 'bad PR' doesn't effect them in the slightest and Americans have already forgotten about their past issues with facial recognition, except a small percentage of techies that visit sites like this, not any majority of society.
No, not in the slightest. Seems solely designed to push more banner advertisements instead of providing content. Even on Desktop you're unable to see 1 or more posts at a time if there's an image post open.
I've been using a $169 Android One Xiaomi and the only difference I can tell between my original Pixel 1 is with the Camera and lack of USB-C. Xiaomi gets 3x the battery life. I have a Sony A6500 that I use for photos and just WiFi transfer them to the Xiaomi seamlessly. No reason for a really cutting edge phone anymore unless you use it primarily for gaming or absolutely need a top tier camera?
No, profit motive leads to more shelter being built for those who can afford it and everyone outside of that gets to live on the streets. See: Seattle.