HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ratherbefuddled

678 カルマ登録 14 年前

コメント

ratherbefuddled
·9 日前·議論
Turning this on by default is insane.
ratherbefuddled
·18 日前·議論
I read this as "Claude integration to Slack is now billed as API usage". Is that wrong?
ratherbefuddled
·3 か月前·議論
Sometimes I wonder if people understand what "non-deterministic" means?

These things are generators of pleasing words. They are random and not at all thinking.

Why would anybody think that prompt guardrails would be effective?
ratherbefuddled
·3 か月前·議論
Typing ten extra characters is an investment that pays off vs the overhead of doing any piece of work in the future. There's no real downside here, it doesn't make the code more complex, it gives less surprising results.

I think you are conflating YAGNI and premature optimisation and neither apply in this case.
ratherbefuddled
·6 か月前·議論
It's not that it must be registered (incorporated) in Germany. It's that for tax purposes if the company is run from Germany it will be considered "permanently established" and treated as resident there. Permanent establishment laws are often quite surprising to people doing business across different territories.
ratherbefuddled
·8 か月前·議論
> If I've got a long, random, unique, securely-stored password, I don't actually care about having a second factor

I'm not comfortable with my entire online identity being protected by a single line of defence which is a company that I'm paying a few dollars a month to. Not having to type 6 digits off a phone is a pretty minor convenience for me.
ratherbefuddled
·9 か月前·議論
I'm more than happy to pay for DRM free epubs. I won't pay for a crippled rental of a book that only works on amazon or adobe blessed devices and can be confiscated on the whim of a corporation who won't be answerable for it.
ratherbefuddled
·9 か月前·議論
Thanks very much.
ratherbefuddled
·9 か月前·議論
Thank you, that's really useful.
ratherbefuddled
·9 か月前·議論
Having just had solar and a battery fitted by Octopus I'm interested - would you mind sharing what you use for automation here please?
ratherbefuddled
·10 か月前·議論
We are talking about an extremely powerful corporation in an antitrust case not a person. It does not need to be defended in this way, which is a level of protection rarely afforded to individuals.

There is a definite public interest in understanding how Google conducts itself given the reach and impact it has.

There is no way for the public to have confidence in the trial process if it is conducted in secret, and given the outcome every reason to question the process.

I'm surprised anybody objective would defend this.
ratherbefuddled
·10 か月前·議論
There's very little reason that Google should have been protected from the evidence of its wrongdoing being made public. That's not extrajudicial punishment, that is public record. Justice should be seen to be done as well as done.

Who can know how appropriate or not the remedy was when the evidence is hidden?

For full disclosure: I'm neither a google employee nor a US citizen.
ratherbefuddled
·4 年前·議論
I think this is largely a London thing rather than a UK thing.