HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

redrove

no profile record

コメント

redrove
·15 日前·議論
No, it doesn’t seem like it.
redrove
·15 日前·議論
I’m sorry but I can’t take a European Commission link seriously about training SOTA LLMs.
redrove
·17 日前·議論
Do you have any sources for this? Genuinely interested in reading more.
redrove
·21 日前·議論
No it’s not.

You’re generalizing, DACH != the entire EU.
redrove
·23 日前·議論
> My dream would be a local model that can do, say, 80% of the day to day tasks I need; "how does X Handler connect to Y storage?", "commit that feature, but leave out the bits that relate to billing" etc.

Qwen 3.6 27B can do that today, but setup properly and in a good quant, I run an autoround [0] with weights in int8 and attention heads in f16 on a single RTX 6000 Pro Blackwell Max-Q via vllm with mtp=2 and full context, --max-num-seqs 3, KV in f16, mamba f32.

>It would have 99% reliable tool calling

I managed to score 93/100 in tool-eval-bench [1]. For me this is very good already, at least in the pi coding harness I've never had an issue that wasn't auto-fixed in the next turn(s).

>the ability to go "this task is beyond my skills" and refer to a Big Boy Online Model in a gigantic datacenter somewhere

This is heavy on the harness engineering side I think, but also quite contrary to the nature of LLMs today. If you figure this out I'd love to know.

[0] https://huggingface.co/Minachist/Qwen3.6-27B-INT8-AutoRound/...

[1] https://github.com/SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench
redrove
·24 日前·議論
They’re still debating that, they’ll get back to us soon I’m sure.
redrove
·先月·議論
I read the entire thing and it seems to me like they started with the conclusion and tried to find proof, like a lot of psychology papers.

Thoroughly unreliable.
redrove
·先月·議論
It’s about bang for buck. That high a score for 5B params is pretty good, nigh unbelievable a short while ago.

It is my belief that smaller models will get better and better, and even cloud SOTA models will shrink.

Yet another reason the current buildout will feel like the railroads.
redrove
·先月·議論
Wow, if you you could've just done docker compose up. I guess we'll never know.
redrove
·先月·議論
So the theory goes. Can you point out one place where this is working out?
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
Don’t vibe code your auth path folks.
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
I’m genuinely interested in what you find to be the problem with that?

It’s a landing page.
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
curl | bash and pentesting go well together
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
I’m immediately suspicious of cheap chinese crap like this.

$35 for a projector should cause you to raise at least one eyebrow.

Also, as always with “IoT” type devices, they’re best kept in an isolated VLAN with no internet access.
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
What coding plans are you using that let you use those models specifically and not pay per token? Which provider?
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
So this is basically vCluster[0] but Rancher branded?

[0] https://github.com/loft-sh/vcluster
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
cool!
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
Nothing, but he got to plug his vibe coded startup that he advertises in the about section.
redrove
·2 か月前·議論
It’s 128b dense model. Good luck getting more than 3t/s out of a mac. It doesn’t matter if it fits or not.