HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

rfmoz

no profile record

投稿

Mobile Web Computing Before Smartphones. (University of Liverpool, ~2010) [pdf]

cgi.csc.liv.ac.uk
16 ポイント·投稿者 rfmoz·16 日前·3 コメント

Most complex cloud service dependency chain you've seen?

2 ポイント·投稿者 rfmoz·4 か月前·0 コメント

Omero: Pervasive User Interfaces in the Plan B Operating System

youtube.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 rfmoz·6 か月前·0 コメント

The Evolution of Packet Switching – 1978 [pdf]

ece.ucf.edu
3 ポイント·投稿者 rfmoz·8 か月前·1 コメント

HAProxy Unified Gateway (Beta)

haproxy.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 rfmoz·8 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

rfmoz
·20 日前·議論
[dead]
rfmoz
·2 か月前·議論
The main differences between OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD and DragonFly BSD

https://unixdigest.com/articles/the-main-differences-between...
rfmoz
·2 か月前·議論
I used to run it on a laptop too, but the battery life was shorter and the laptop ran noticeably hotter than under Linux, so I eventually switched back.

That said, OpenBSD feels unusually coherent (ej. check wifi connection from terminal). The whole system has a level of consistency that's hard to find elsewhere, also between other BSDs.

For pet servers, it usually fits perfect.
rfmoz
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
rfmoz
·2 か月前·議論
Totally agree, Vis really hits an spot between modern feel without losing what made vi great. The structural regex is a game-changer.
rfmoz
·2 か月前·議論
I miss on the list Counterpoint GUI for Amstrad PCs with MS-DOS

https://www.seasip.info/AmstradXT/Counterpoint/index.html
rfmoz
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
rfmoz
·3 か月前·議論
Any provider for critical domain vault?
rfmoz
·3 か月前·議論
Search on bios-mods for a modified whitelist BIOS firmware -> https://www.bios-mods.com/forum/Forum-WiFi-WWAN-Whitelist-Re...
rfmoz
·3 か月前·議論
There are modified BIOS firmware that allow any WiFi card. Good luck
rfmoz
·4 か月前·議論
Vis editor [0] also has multicursor and powerful sam's structural regular expression

[0]: https://github.com/martanne/vis
rfmoz
·5 か月前·議論
Yes, "everything is a file" but the mouse on Rio is written in stone.

Aside of that, plan9 wins on the theoretical side, it was a research OS, but in the practical one... it's opinionated.
rfmoz
·5 か月前·議論
Linux Firewalls by Steve Suehring covers nftables. It’s a good book to know the basics.
rfmoz
·6 か月前·議論
Give a try to Meshcore, their design has proven to be reliable in realworld use.
rfmoz
·6 か月前·議論
Chinese AI is doing large amounts of request in the past weeks.
rfmoz
·6 か月前·議論
They had pretty neat infra, maybe it still runs in the same clever way. https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10369/which-tools-a...
rfmoz
·6 か月前·議論
Quora, sadly, is a good example of enshittification.
rfmoz
·7 か月前·議論
I reply myself because I've found that idea already porposed:

"Origin policy was a proposal for a web platform mechanism that allows origins to set their origin-wide configuration in a central location, instead of using per-response HTTP headers." - https://github.com/WICG/origin-policy

But their status is "[On hold for now]" since, at least, three years ago.
rfmoz
·7 か月前·議論
The reference of robots.txt offer a good way to define specific behavior for the whole domain, as example. Something like that for security could be enough for large amount of websites.

Also, a new header like “sec-policy: foo-url” may be a clean way to move away that definitions from the app+web+proxy+cdn mesh to a fixed clear point.
rfmoz
·7 か月前·議論
Adding more security headers every year feels like strapping seatbelts onto a collapsing roller coaster. It would be better to stop this "sec headers stack" in favour of simpler, secure by default browser primitives with explicit opt-out. Getting an example from https://securityheaders.com the list nowadays is as follows:

- Strict-Transport-Security - Content-Security-Policy - X-Frame-Options - X-Content-Type-Options - Referrer-Policy - Permissions-Policy - Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy - Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy - Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy