HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

rhavaei

no profile record

投稿

Supabase MCP can leak your entire SQL database

generalanalysis.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

[untitled]

2 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

A comprehensive analysis of Llama4 safety in CBRN tasks vs. closed-source models [pdf]

generalanalysis.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

LLM Robustness/Safety Benchmark

generalanalysis.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

An Implementation of AutoDAN Turbo

colab.research.google.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

Using Deepseek R1 to Break LLMs: Tree of Attacks

colab.research.google.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

The Jailbreak Bible

generalanalysis.com
17 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·4 コメント

Red-Teaming ChatGPT for Hallucinations – Code and Report

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·0 コメント

Consistent Jailbreaking Method in o1, o3, and 4o

generalanalysis.com
8 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·17 コメント

Jailbroken: Finding 50,000 Legal Hallucinations in GPT-4o with RL

generalanalysis.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 rhavaei·昨年·2 コメント

コメント

rhavaei
·昨年·議論
Stay safe out there kids.
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
I have been working on a project for a few months now coding up different methodologies for LLM Jailbreaking. The idea was to stress-test how safe the new LLMs in production are and how easy is is to trick them. I have seen some pretty cool results with some of the methods like TAP (Tree of Attacks) so I wanted to share this here. Here is the github link: https://github.com/General-Analysis/GA
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
Codebase on https://github.com/General-Analysis/GA
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
Let’s go!
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
very nice blogpost.
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
good idea. Will do.
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
While this is generally correct, we prefer to look at this probabilistically. Do you think the expected number of harmful behaviors would stay the same if anyone could break these safety guardrails? Even if most users are could get this kind of info elsewhere, a small percentage of malicious ones can have an outsized impact. Some of the data we’ve seen—like bomb-making instructions—is highly detailed and convincing, making it far more accessible than just a random Google search. Removing safeguards doesn’t create masterminds, but it does lower the barrier for harm.
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
You will see it soon. We thought it may be harmful to publish it before it is patched. Especially because you can basically bypass all the safeguards with it.
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
We understand this. The issue is that it can be very harmful for us to share the method. We made the blogpost for it to be dated on when we found it. We will publish the method once it is patched to a reasonable degree.
rhavaei
·昨年·議論
Yes the data is available on our github https://github.com/General-Analysis/GA