Lovely CSS and nice content chunking, but perhaps overly biased towards finding utility with LLMs as there is too little information about cautions to take.
Most egregiously, on the AI is stateless page[0], it shows relying on an llm reponse to call a program via sudo. I can't think of a system where a professional programmer could justify such a risk.
I think after "AI predicts text" it makes less sense to say "AI is just another API" than something like "AI makes APIs fuzzy" because the stochasticity makes an AI API anything but "just another API." Most people think of APIs as deterministic in function, AFAIK.
I /feel/ similarly intuition-wise. But models are crazy and what they respond to is often unpredictable. There are no lungs in an AI model but nonetheless 'take a deep breath' as a prompt has shown[0] improvement on math scores lol
Personally I strongly disapprove of the first/second person pronouns and allowing them [encouraging, even] to output 'we' when talking about humans.
The effective demand for Opus 4.5 is bottomless; the models will only get better.
People will always want a code model as good as we have now, let alone better.
Bun securing default status in the best coding model is a win-win-win