HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

roca

no profile record

コメント

roca
·3 か月前·議論
It's not that.
roca
·10 か月前·議論
Especially with combined with reverse-execution in rr or UndoDB!
roca
·10 か月前·議論
Record-and-replay debuggers like rr and UndoDB are designed for exactly this scenario. In fact it's way better than logging; with logging, in practice, you usually don't have the logs you need the first time, so you have to iterate "add logs, rerun 600 times" several times. With rr and UndoDB you just have to reproduce once and then you'll be able to figure it out.
roca
·4 年前·議論
Keeping GPT-3 behind an API lets OpenAI track how the model is being used and filter outputs they deem potentially harmful.
roca
·4 年前·議論
In Afghanistan? Unlikely to be hundreds of thousands of civilians killed by Americans/allies. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/af... says "at least 71,000 civilians killed" and many of those would have been killed by other side(s).

"Justified"? Probably not, but we'd have to determine what alternative actions America/allies should have taken instead and compare.

I mean, "avoid all US-caused civilian deaths by letting AQ continue to operate from Afghanistan with impunity after 9/11" would not obviously have been the right thing to do.
roca
·4 年前·議論
Maybe only America truly knows, but CND (via Wikipedia) agrees with me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_sharing https://cnduk.org/resources/united-states-nuclear-weapons-eu...
roca
·4 年前·議論
Eastern and Western Europe would have been crazy to gamble everything on the hope that admitting Russia to NATO somehow neutralizes Russia, not NATO.
roca
·4 年前·議論
That is pure speculation.

Even if you're right, Eastern European countries would be stupid to put their trust in Russian dictators staying benevolent. They were smart and joined NATO.
roca
·4 年前·議論
The US-supported Afghan government wasn't worse than the governments before or after it.

South Korea's an interesting example. It was a dictatorship, now it's a thriving democracy. Ditto for Japan, Taiwan, West Germany. Sometimes things turn out alright.
roca
·4 年前·議論
Interesting. I can open it fine. Here's some relevant text:

> So, I will start with the fact that modern Ukraine was entirely created by Russia or, to be more precise, by Bolshevik, Communist Russia. This process started practically right after the 1917 revolution, and Lenin and his associates did it in a way that was extremely harsh on Russia – by separating, severing what is historically Russian land.

Read the whole thing. If you're going to defend Russian policy online you should have a clear idea what you're defending.
roca
·4 年前·議論
China won't be interested in propping up Russia. There's nothing in it for them.
roca
·4 年前·議論
Nonsense. NATO will never risk nuclear war unless Russia attacks a NATO country first.

If NATO was willing to risk attacking Russia, they would already be fighting in Ukraine, which is a much lesser risk. They'll arm Ukraine but they won't fight there.
roca
·4 年前·議論
The US military killed nowhere near that many. It was mostly internecine warfare.
roca
·4 年前·議論
> Why not?

If America's plan was to take Iraq's oil, what went wrong with the plan, given Iraqis still control their oil?
roca
·4 年前·議論
If Starfleet's policy is to simply stand aside and watch while one civilization genocides another, I'm not a fan.
roca
·4 年前·議論
The US spent many billions of dollars feeding Afghanistan, building infrastructure, educating its people, and trying to protect them (especially women) from the Taliban. It didn't work, unfortunately.
roca
·4 年前·議論
Also, Russia already has NATO states on its borders, and there aren't nukes stationed there.
roca
·4 年前·議論
If Russia had joined NATO then there would be nothing to stop Putin taking the Baltic states right now.
roca
·4 年前·議論
"Russia has no fear of NATO" => "Putin takes Baltic states".
roca
·4 年前·議論
He wouldn't have believed the list. Just like a lot of Europeans didn't believe he would invade Ukraine.