HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

rsafaya

no profile record

投稿

Show HN: LiveTap – Analyze live streaming data with Claude Code Channels

github.com
12 ポイント·投稿者 rsafaya·3 か月前·5 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 rsafaya·4 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 rsafaya·4 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

rsafaya
·3 か月前·議論
Thank you. Let me know if you have any feedback.
rsafaya
·3 か月前·議論
[dead]
rsafaya
·3 か月前·議論
Really nice. It should save a bunch of time in research.
rsafaya
·3 か月前·議論
Maybe it's time scrapers actually paid publishers via something like HTTP 402 for their data instead of an arms race with Cloudflare on one side and residential proxies on the other.
rsafaya
·3 か月前·議論
Really good project for a quick data back end.

One feature suggestion: webhook support for row changes:

If my Sheet updates (say, a new waitlist signup), I'd want to trigger for e.g. a Slack notification. Supabase has something similar with their database webhooks. I use that extensively for kicking off signup workflows.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Many years ago I saw the "pale blue dot" photograph by voyager 1 from the 90s. I use it as a reminder to myself to make the most of our time here.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Can confirm good canvas renderer performance. Just tested it with a real-time smart meter dashboard — 62 meters streaming over MQTT via JustinX.ai (our data ingestion platform), 60 msg/s (peak), 500ms refresh. Almost no flicker, smooth updates across all meter cards. Much nicer way to handle high-frequency streaming data than xterm.js.

Check out the video screen grab: https://streamable.com/hcga8t
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
I think the A2A space is wide open. Great to see this approach using App Server and Channels. I tried built something similar (at a high level) for a more B2C use case for OpenClaw https://github.com/agentlink-dev/agentlink users. Currently I think the major Agents have not fully owned the "wake the Agent" use case fully. Regardless this is a very cool approach. All the best.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
I think this would be super useful as a claude code / visual studio extension, so I can see the cost impact of changes I am making in code. For example by adding a prompt pre-processing function how much am I actually going to save in LLM token cost.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Great initiative igor. Really like the clean mermaid diagram support.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
[dead]
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Super cool. How do you see people using this vs. something more generic like miro?
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Makes a lot of sense. Any plans to support openrouter? We use that extensively instead of connecting directly to the model providers.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Setting up WhatsApp is a pain and this really helps. I really like your docs page explains the "how do I do this" really clearly. All the best.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Very nice idea. I have sent a little note to me and my founder in the future. It has a nice "time capsule" like feel to send a message out. Really makes you think about what you want to say.

Well done. All the best.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
What are your thoughts on OC security?
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
There is a real risk but probably not directly from someone targeting you. Your agent reading a webpage or email that happens to contain injected instructions is a risk. It is really a surface area problem. I would suggest you ask claude/whatever to scan your OC dirs regularly.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Ok Ill be honest. I have not tried it yet. But I just loved the fire animation!
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
I wish I had found this earlier. Nothing like looking at thousands of EV charger logs all day to mak you appreciate something like this.
rsafaya
·4 か月前·議論
Cool project — the "agent is a folder" philosophy is genuinely appealing. I spend most of my day in Claude Code, which is basically a primitive version with: flat memory files, file tools for self-management, context that gets trimmed.

The one thing I'd push on: the bet that the agent will reliably manage its own memory with read/write tools hasn't played out for me in practice. Claude has file tools and a memory directory today, and it still forgets things I've told it dozens of times — the bottleneck isn't storage, it's that the LLM doesn't reliably decide what to save or when to retrieve. That said, preserving full JSONL history on disk and only trimming at inference time is a genuinely better model than lossy compression — I wish Claude Code did that instead of auto-compact.

Have you thought about layering lightweight semantic retrieval over the knowledge/folder so the agent doesn't have to manually grep its own brain?