HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

sandwitches

no profile record

コメント

sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
This particular brand of Hackernewsian condescension is unreal. I'd be amazed if it weren't so depressing. Please don't belittle someone's very real grievances like this, thank you.
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
Because AI bullshit is ruining everything we've ever loved?
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
Here's a good rule of thumb: any time you try to undo a billion years of evolution, there will probably be unintended side effects. Go to bed.
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
Shhh, you said the quiet part out loud!
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
If you're kidding, it's not funny. If you're serious, that's a joke.
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
Google "filibuster" and "US Senate", and then maybe you'll understand why your statement is in bad faith.
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
You don't find it a little unfair that doing something the government makes you do is so Byzantine and fraught with error that there is an entire cottage industry around doing it? When the only reason it's so awful is because of policy choices largely out of our control?

What if we deliberately slowed your car down, threw our hands up because "it is what it is", and then said you could fix it by paying $500? Wow, we solved the problem!
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
Will they cover the fee for the accountant to fix their own mistake?
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
It's almost like it's intentional.
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
I shouldn't have to explain why this isn't a viable long-term solution, right?
sandwitches
·2 年前·議論
I see several massive I-beams in your argument that are buckling due to a lack of support. Mind shoring them up with sources, boss?