HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

schnable

no profile record

コメント

schnable
·5 か月前·議論
Agreed that feedback loops on top of generative LLMs will not get us to AGI or true intelligence.
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
You can define "ponder" in multiple ways, but really this is why thinking models exist - they turn over the prompt multiple times and iterate on responses to get to a better end result.
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
It's useful to point out hypocrisy, but are you suggesting we shouldn't try to protect kids because of Jeffrey Epstein?
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
* stop making new models and people keep using the existing models, not switch to a competitor still investing in new models.
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
well if you're making complaints that aren't true, or asking for functionality that exists already, your complaints don't seem very credible to me.
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
Yes, and the content itself is clearly AI generated marketing nonsense.
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
Article is AI slop based on a mostly made up premise.
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
I think half your examples are made up, or not Apple's fault, but it sounds like what you really want is to disable your passcode.
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
Siri doesnt make me unlock the phone to give a weather report.
schnable
·5 か月前·議論
there used to be a higher alignment in the US between political motivations and morality.
schnable
·6 か月前·議論
> Should the general public be more diligent in checking the sender domain of the emails they read?

yes
schnable
·6 か月前·議論
I think the main motivator is that most people/businesses would not want their transactional emails to include political at all.
schnable
·6 か月前·議論
What's the purpose of a primary election? It's to select a party's candidate for a general election. It's not very obvious that this should even be a democratic process, but if it is, why shouldn't party members be the ones selecting their own candidates?
schnable
·7 か月前·議論
This is a bad idea. But in the same spirit, a bad but less bad idea: require the user to actively enable the deprecated feature via config or something, but have a known schedule to eventually expire it (with a hard error, not randomly incorrect data) and force the user to re-enable it. Causes some pain but not random, hard to track down bug. More like dealing with expiring certs - eventually, the user will want a permanent fix.
schnable
·7 か月前·議論
how do de-aggregation attacks or whatever you'd call this work?
schnable
·7 か月前·議論
That's not really a rip off, it caters to people who can't afford to buy in larger quantities.
schnable
·7 か月前·議論
This is how it was with cable, and it was actually better for the content providers. They made shows and got fat checks from the cable companies every year.

Then they all copied Netflix, because the stockmarket was rewarding it, and had to start dealing with billing, customer retention, technology platforms, advertising platforms. And they all lost a ton of money a doing it.
schnable
·7 か月前·議論
It still works this way.
schnable
·7 か月前·議論
Why is it a poor proxy? Someone who really understands the concepts and has the aptitude for it will get answers more quickly than someone who is shakier on it. The person who groks it less may be able to get to the answer, but needs to spend more time working through the problem. They're less good at calculus and should get a lower grade! Maybe they shouldn't fail Calc 101, but may deserve a B or (the horror) a C. Maybe that person will never get an A is calculus and that should be ok.

Joel Spolsky explained this well about what makes a good programmer[1]. "If the basic concepts aren’t so easy that you don’t even have to think about them, you’re not going to get the big concepts."

[1] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2006/10/25/the-guerrilla-guid...
schnable
·7 か月前·議論
If you think they nickel and dime customers, you should see what they do to TV and streaming device makers. They can make basically any demand they want because you can't ship with Netflix.