HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

segfaultex

75 カルマ登録 3 年前

コメント

segfaultex
·昨日·議論
The overwhelming majority of local businesses around me don't have websites, just a FB page. If you want to look at upcoming events, specials, restaurant menus, etc. you either have to hope FB doesn't throw up the "you need an acct to see this page" blocker, or sign up.
segfaultex
·4 か月前·議論
You think making the biggest breakthrough in battery tech is easier than monetary incentives?
segfaultex
·4 か月前·議論
>The native integration knows about car's battery state all the time and auto-suggests stops.

CarPlay does this on my F150 Lightning. It manages state, preconditioning when routing to a charging stop, will suggest charging stops as I'm routing, etc. etc.

There's really nothing special about GM's implementation IMO, except that they charge you monthly to access it.
segfaultex
·4 か月前·議論
We bought an F150 Lightning instead of a Sierra EV mainly because of this. I'm not interested in 'cars as a service'.
segfaultex
·4 か月前·議論
Deleted mine months ago. Altman is one of the slimiest tech ceos out there, which is saying something.
segfaultex
·4 か月前·議論
Yes. I see it hallucinate method names for 3rd party libraries constantly.

It’s useful, but when users here say they’re vibe coding 98% of their work, I have to think they’re not working on anything complex.
segfaultex
·5 か月前·議論
Conversely, I have yet to see agentic coding tools produce anything I’d be willing to ship.
segfaultex
·6 か月前·議論
If I had to bet; they'll put their 3.7L V6 in and run it on the miller cycle with a fixed drive to hit @130+kW or so.

The changes for cooling, etc. will be substantial, but the problem space is already well-known by the team, so the time to market probably won't be as long as we think.
segfaultex
·6 か月前·議論
Also bought a Lightning. I use it for plenty of truck related things that don't involve towing and it's great. I like to target shoot on family farm land, and it's awesome to toss my steel targets and equipment in the bed and offroad to the area I shoot on (there's an area pretty far in with a sharp elevation change that's created a large berm). Or going to lowes to get a ton of fertilizer/plants/gardening equipment for my spouse.

I also use it to commute, and it's even better at that (part of that is mine being the Platinum trim). Quiet, smooth, powerful, has Android Auto/CarPlay (unlike GM's products), etc.

They really are a fantastic vehicle for those who don't need to quickly tow heavy trailers 400 miles. Especially on the used market.

I think the issue was that Ford wasn't making much margin on them and they weren't moving sufficient volume to make up for that. (around 20K/yr avg)
segfaultex
·6 か月前·議論
That’s not what I’m suggesting at all.
segfaultex
·6 か月前·議論
Sounds like an argument for better hiring practices and planning.

Producing a lot of code isn’t proof of anything.
segfaultex
·6 か月前·議論
I wholeheartedly agree. Shitty companies steal art and then put out shitty products that shitty people use to spam us with slop.

The same goes for code as well.

I’ve explored Claude code/antigravity/etc, found them mostly useless, tried a more interactive approach with copilot/local models/ tried less interactive “agents”/etc. it’s largely all slop.

My coworkers who claim they’re shipping at warp speed using generative AI are almost categorically our worst developers by a mile.
segfaultex
·7 か月前·議論
Or the Apple Watch, AirPods, HomePod, iPad, etc.

They’ve made plenty of things. I liken them to the Lexus of consumer electronics; expensive for what they are, thoughtfully designed, and conservative in their approach to adopting new trends.
segfaultex
·7 か月前·議論
Why not both? And that's a good point, there are a LOT of incentives to make things arbitrarily complex in a variety of fields.
segfaultex
·7 か月前·議論
Not the original commenter, but I 100% agree that it's weird we have so many ways to describe dictionaries/hash tables/maps/etc. and lists.
segfaultex
·7 か月前·議論
Yeah, I don't want to be uncharitable, but I've noticed that a lot of stem fields make heavy use of esoteric language and syntax, and I suspect they do so as a means of gatekeeping.

I understand that some degree of formalism is required to enable the sharing of knowledge amongst people across a variety of languages, but sometimes I'll read a white paper and think "wow, this could be written a LOT more simply".

Statistics is a major culprit of this.
segfaultex
·8 か月前·議論
I'd argue that placing faith in any large institution is folly. Especially when that institution has a bunch of perverse incentives to act immorally.

Any nation with any amount of leverage has abused it.
segfaultex
·8 か月前·議論
I think we'll see a lot of companies moving away from public cloud providers in the future, but I don't think it'll be because of any privacy-related concerns.

It rarely makes economic sense to deploy workloads onto the public cloud unless you have critical uptime requirements or need massive elasticity.
segfaultex
·9 か月前·議論
I have scarcely gotten decent code. The best a model has spat out is 'fine', which is ok for menial tasks.

I have yet to see anyone show me an AI generated project that I'd be willing to put into production.

IDK, I feel like 'vibe coders' or people who heavily rely on LLM's have allowed their skills (if they ever existed) to atrophy such that they're generally not great at assessing the output from models.
segfaultex
·10 か月前·議論
I don't understand how one would come to the conclusion that this is new behavior from Apple.

The first MacBook Airs were wildly impractical and expensive.

The first iPad suffered from the same issues.

Various iterations of the iPod nano were functionally kneecapped.

I see a lot of cherrypicking and not a lot of reasoning in this essay.