HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

sesm

1,488 カルマ登録 13 年前

コメント

sesm
·5 日前·議論
What's the Elm definition of simplicity? Genuinely asking, because the concept of simplicity is very vague and overloaded in programming.
sesm
·16 日前·議論
> Rick Rubin told Anderson Cooper he has no technical ability. Doesn't play instruments. Can't work a mixing board.

If you watch his interview on Rick Beato's channel, this myth will fall apart. He plays guitar, had his own punk rock band and his guitar playing is featured on some high-profile records he produced. Also, he has a lot of practical experience with all kinds of studio equipment.
sesm
·28 日前·議論
> Do that well and you can build what a team of twenty engineers would put out in a month for around a thousand dollars.

As usual, an extraordinary claim without an extraordinary evidence: https://stephen.bochinski.dev/apps/
sesm
·先月·議論
I would argue that those are not emergent property of the model, but a property of how humans find insights in a plausible guess.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
"AI" is a marketing term, LLMs and Difusion Models are math.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
They want to run local models
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
No, it's much worse. It will take much more time to review and notice that it doesn't actually solve the problem at hand.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
Agree, after closer look smart pointer types are pretty standard and collections were indeed a part of migration.

But still, in order to prepare those detailed and very project-specific instructions you need to iterate on trying to convert the files from this specific codebase.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
When announcements say that rewrite took 1 week, I wonder how much time went into preparing this file with very detailed instructions on mapping Zig to Rust idioms: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/commit/46d3bc29f270fa881dd573...

On top of that, if you look at 'Pointers & ownership' and 'Collections' sections, the Bun codebase is already prepared, using internal smart pointer types that map 1-to-1 to Rust equivalents, and `bun_collections` Rust crate already exists.

This makes an impression, that rewrite was prepared long time ago and was Bun team proposition to Anthropic during the acquisition deal.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
I wonder, did they consider an approach of vibe-coding a deterministic converter and then running it? This should be much more token efficient.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
Just to clarify, you did this for C tools using LLMs or using deterministic conversion tools?
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
I guess they vibe-rewrite to C, relying on CCC compiler. Agent loop will be modifying both the project and the compiler until the ends meet.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
> Or maybe the Zig team is in a greater danger, since their brains hold the genius juice the clankers are missing and they should have it by 2027

Imagine you want to monopolize programming by pushing LLM as an obligatory middle-men. Then people who can program without LLMs are direct threat to your business plan. It's time for us to start hiding. I'm cosidering adding `co-authored by Claude Code` to my hand-written commits and running Claude in useless loops to mock API usage.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
Wasn't looking at leaked Claude Code source already enough for the ridicule?
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
The reason for this is: the only way to show productivity gains enabled by AI is to lay off people and pretend you are doing the same amount of work (while in reality you are severely dropping quality and accumulating technical debt).
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
But it's a team sport. For example, in Dota 2 you should be trying to dominate your opponents. If you are trying to dominate your teammates instead (by prioritizing better KDA) you are most likely ruining the game.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
The new meaning of OCD
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
You won't ship a perfect product even if you make 0 mistakes. Software maintenance is adapting the product based on feedback from the outside world which you could never get during development.
sesm
·2 か月前·議論
Are you talking about dominating your peers to get a promotion?